7:50 a.m.
* Review current status of all modules (quick overview of what we have, any blocking
issues, future work needed for Seam 3.0)
* Work out a plan to help those along that are lagging
Reminder, meeting starts at 10:00 eastern :-)
7:49 a.m.
We went through all modules, and I wrote up the module status
http://www.seamframework.org/Seam3/MeetingTranscript20100716#H-ModuleStat...
Additionally, we discussed the use of Maven central, and all agreed that we should switch
to just using the JBoss Repository for now. We will reconsider using Maven central in the
future.
On 15 Jul 2010, at 13:50, Pete Muir wrote:
* Review current status of all modules (quick overview of what we
have, any blocking issues, future work needed for Seam 3.0)
* Work out a plan to help those along that are lagging
Reminder, meeting starts at 10:00 eastern :-)
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
2:08 p.m.
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com> wrote:
We went through all modules, and I wrote up the module status
http://www.seamframework.org/Seam3/MeetingTranscript20100716#H-ModuleStat...
Additionally, we discussed the use of Maven central, and all agreed that we
should switch to just using the JBoss Repository for now. We will reconsider
using Maven central in the future.
I recently came to the same conclusion. The JBoss Repository is now a
superset of central (so unlike before, it's not deficient in that regard)
and honestly, it provides a much better experience for anyone using JBoss
Community projects. But the key point is that we don't have to put our
community on hold trying to get a library outside of our control into
central.
So +1
-Dan
--
Dan Allen
Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597
http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
2:18 p.m.
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com> wrote:
We went through all modules, and I wrote up the module status
http://www.seamframework.org/Seam3/MeetingTranscript20100716#H-ModuleStat...
Great job guys, especially our community module leads. There are a lot of
different moving parts, but if you focus on the module you are working on,
they are all going to come together and make a huge impact. Reminds me of a
Transformer combiner, like the Construction Devastator that was showcased in
Transformers 2. (Yes, I was a transformer collector as a child :))
-Dan
--
Dan Allen
Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597
http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
9:57 a.m.
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 06:49, Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com> wrote:
We went through all modules, and I wrote up the module status
http://www.seamframework.org/Seam3/MeetingTranscript20100716#H-ModuleStat...
We're missing Faces and Servlet modules on that list.
Additionally, we discussed the use of Maven central, and all agreed
that we should switch to just using the JBoss Repository for now. We will reconsider using
Maven central in the future.
On 15 Jul 2010, at 13:50, Pete Muir wrote:
> * Review current status of all modules (quick overview of what we have, any blocking
issues, future work needed for Seam 3.0)
> * Work out a plan to help those along that are lagging
>
> Reminder, meeting starts at 10:00 eastern :-)
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
--
Jason Porter
http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/lightguardjp
Software Engineer
Open Source Advocate
PGP key id: 926CCFF5
PGP key available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu
10:06 a.m.
Thanks Jason :-)
I've added those.
On 17 Jul 2010, at 15:57, Jason Porter wrote:
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 06:49, Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> We went through all modules, and I wrote up the module status
>
> http://www.seamframework.org/Seam3/MeetingTranscript20100716#H-ModuleStat...
We're missing Faces and Servlet modules on that list.
> Additionally, we discussed the use of Maven central, and all agreed that we should
switch to just using the JBoss Repository for now. We will reconsider using Maven central
in the future.
>
> On 15 Jul 2010, at 13:50, Pete Muir wrote:
>
>> * Review current status of all modules (quick overview of what we have, any
blocking issues, future work needed for Seam 3.0)
>> * Work out a plan to help those along that are lagging
>>
>> Reminder, meeting starts at 10:00 eastern :-)
>> _______________________________________________
>> seam-dev mailing list
>> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>
--
Jason Porter
http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/lightguardjp
Software Engineer
Open Source Advocate
PGP key id: 926CCFF5
PGP key available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu
5261
days inactive
5263
days old
5 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Dan Allen -
Jason Porter -
Pete Muir