2:13 p.m.
Guys,
I've reduced the session timeouts for in.relation.to and
seamframework.org to 5 minutes and 15 minutes respectively, from 30
minutes. If anyone experiences any issues with this new configuration
please let me know, however it already seems to have had a positive
effect on performance so far.
Shane
3:17 p.m.
Don't take too long editing pages ;)
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Shane Bryzak <sbryzak(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Guys,
I've reduced the session timeouts for in.relation.to and
seamframework.org to 5 minutes and 15 minutes respectively, from 30
minutes. If anyone experiences any issues with this new configuration
please let me know, however it already seems to have had a positive
effect on performance so far.
Shane
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
--
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.com
http://scrumshark.com
"Keep it Simple"
3:20 p.m.
The real question is: why are connections kept open over requests?
We have got a nice scalability issue here in which we control all variables.
Carlo
On 04/18/2011 03:17 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III wrote:
Don't take too long editing pages ;)
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Shane Bryzak <sbryzak(a)redhat.com
<mailto:sbryzak@redhat.com>> wrote:
Guys,
I've reduced the session timeouts for in.relation.to
<http://in.relation.to> and
seamframework.org <http://seamframework.org> to 5 minutes and 15
minutes respectively, from 30
minutes. If anyone experiences any issues with this new configuration
please let me know, however it already seems to have had a positive
effect on performance so far.
Shane
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:seam-dev@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
--
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.com
http://scrumshark.com
"Keep it Simple"
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
3:59 p.m.
Would there be a way to have short sessions for anonymous, medium for logged users and
long for users in an edit process?
On 18 avr. 2011, at 14:13, Shane Bryzak <sbryzak(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Guys,
I've reduced the session timeouts for in.relation.to and
seamframework.org to 5 minutes and 15 minutes respectively, from 30
minutes. If anyone experiences any issues with this new configuration
please let me know, however it already seems to have had a positive
effect on performance so far.
Shane
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
4:02 p.m.
I believe so, after all it´s a Seam project ! :D
2011/4/18 Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel(a)hibernate.org>
Would there be a way to have short sessions for anonymous, medium
for
logged users and long for users in an edit process?
On 18 avr. 2011, at 14:13, Shane Bryzak <sbryzak(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I've reduced the session timeouts for in.relation.to and
> seamframework.org to 5 minutes and 15 minutes respectively, from 30
> minutes. If anyone experiences any issues with this new configuration
> please let me know, however it already seems to have had a positive
> effect on performance so far.
>
> Shane
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
4:12 p.m.
Well it's more a servlet engine issue potentially.
On 18 avr. 2011, at 16:02, George Gastaldi wrote:
I believe so, after all it´s a Seam project ! :D
2011/4/18 Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel(a)hibernate.org>
Would there be a way to have short sessions for anonymous, medium for logged users and
long for users in an edit process?
On 18 avr. 2011, at 14:13, Shane Bryzak <sbryzak(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I've reduced the session timeouts for in.relation.to and
> seamframework.org to 5 minutes and 15 minutes respectively, from 30
> minutes. If anyone experiences any issues with this new configuration
> please let me know, however it already seems to have had a positive
> effect on performance so far.
>
> Shane
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
7:18 p.m.
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 09:59, Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel(a)hibernate.org>wrote:
Would there be a way to have short sessions for anonymous, medium
for
logged users and long for users in an edit process?
I'm pretty sure the first two are already the case, at least it is on
sfwk.org. The software "rewards" users for logging in, essentially. I like
the idea of having an edit process bump the timeout. I didn't think about
that pattern. The Servlet API allows the timeout can be changed
programmatically at anytime.
-Dan
--
Dan Allen
Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen#about
http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
7:29 p.m.
Maybe an Ajax poll every 5 minutes to keep the session alive if logged in?
-C
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 09:59, Emmanuel Bernard
<emmanuel(a)hibernate.org>
wrote:
>
> Would there be a way to have short sessions for anonymous, medium for
> logged users and long for users in an edit process?
I'm pretty sure the first two are already the case, at least it is on
sfwk.org. The software "rewards" users for logging in, essentially. I like
the idea of having an edit process bump the timeout. I didn't think about
that pattern. The Servlet API allows the timeout can be changed
programmatically at anytime.
-Dan
--
Dan Allen
Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen#about
http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
10:27 p.m.
Actually, those new shorter session times *are* for anonymous users (I
should have mentioned that in my first post). The session timeouts for
logged in users is set in components.xml, and haven't changed. This
should solve the problem with the millions of anonymous visitors reading
Gavin's blog posts.
On 18/04/11 23:59, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
Would there be a way to have short sessions for anonymous, medium for
logged users and long for users in an edit process?
On 18 avr. 2011, at 14:13, Shane Bryzak<sbryzak(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I've reduced the session timeouts for in.relation.to and
> seamframework.org to 5 minutes and 15 minutes respectively, from 30
> minutes. If anyone experiences any issues with this new configuration
> please let me know, however it already seems to have had a positive
> effect on performance so far.
>
> Shane
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
5024
days inactive
5024
days old
8 comments
7 participants
participants (7)
-
Carlo de Wolf -
Cody Lerum -
Dan Allen -
Emmanuel Bernard -
George Gastaldi -
Lincoln Baxter, III -
Shane Bryzak