3:32 p.m.
Just to remind everyone (not sure if this is a problem or not atm ;-) but all Seam modules
should be developed using Java 5 unless there is a strong reason to use Java 6. We should
used the Hudson jobs to ensure that the code builds with Java 5.
9:54 a.m.
I set the CI jobs to run on JDK 5. Should also the snapshots that are
published to the maven repository be built with JDK 5?
On 04/13/2010 03:32 PM, Pete Muir wrote:
Just to remind everyone (not sure if this is a problem or not atm ;-)
but all Seam modules should be developed using Java 5 unless there is a strong reason to
use Java 6. We should used the Hudson jobs to ensure that the code builds with Java 5.
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
12:23 p.m.
Yes.
On 15 Apr 2010, at 08:54, Jozef Hartinger wrote:
I set the CI jobs to run on JDK 5. Should also the snapshots that are
published to the maven repository be built with JDK 5?
On 04/13/2010 03:32 PM, Pete Muir wrote:
> Just to remind everyone (not sure if this is a problem or not atm ;-) but all Seam
modules should be developed using Java 5 unless there is a strong reason to use Java 6. We
should used the Hudson jobs to ensure that the code builds with Java 5.
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
1:19 p.m.
Done, the problems are:
ShrinkWrap API (alpha5) targets Java 1.6
- currently breaks drools, international and jms modules
jboss-ejb3-api-3.1.0.jar targets Java 1.6
- currently breaks envconfig module
Other compilation problems
- Faces https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/SEAMFACES-13
- Remoting https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/SEAMREMOTING-3
On 04/15/2010 12:23 PM, Pete Muir wrote:
Yes.
On 15 Apr 2010, at 08:54, Jozef Hartinger wrote:
> I set the CI jobs to run on JDK 5. Should also the snapshots that are published to
the maven repository be built with JDK 5?
>
> On 04/13/2010 03:32 PM, Pete Muir wrote:
>> Just to remind everyone (not sure if this is a problem or not atm ;-) but all
Seam modules should be developed using Java 5 unless there is a strong reason to use Java
6. We should used the Hudson jobs to ensure that the code builds with Java 5.
>> _______________________________________________
>> seam-dev mailing list
>> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
2:15 p.m.
Jozef Hartinger wrote:
Done, the problems are:
ShrinkWrap API (alpha5) targets Java 1.6
- currently breaks drools, international and jms modules
There was an alpha-6 (and
later versions) which targets Java 1.5:
http://community.jboss.org/thread/147880?tstart=0
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/SHRINKWRAP-131
jboss-ejb3-api-3.1.0.jar targets Java 1.6
- currently breaks envconfig module
The jboss-ejb3-api artifact has been
deprecated. Please switch over to
org.jboss.spec.javax.ejb:jboss-ejb-api_3.1_spec artifact
http://repository.jboss.org/maven2/org/jboss/spec/javax/ejb/jboss-ejb-api....
That however is not going to solve the original issue, since it still
targets 1.6
-Jaikiran
Other compilation problems
- Faces https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/SEAMFACES-13
- Remoting https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/SEAMREMOTING-3
On 04/15/2010 12:23 PM, Pete Muir wrote:
> Yes.
>
> On 15 Apr 2010, at 08:54, Jozef Hartinger wrote:
>
>> I set the CI jobs to run on JDK 5. Should also the snapshots that are published
to the maven repository be built with JDK 5?
>>
>> On 04/13/2010 03:32 PM, Pete Muir wrote:
>>> Just to remind everyone (not sure if this is a problem or not atm ;-) but all
Seam modules should be developed using Java 5 unless there is a strong reason to use Java
6. We should used the Hudson jobs to ensure that the code builds with Java 5.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> seam-dev mailing list
>>> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
2:17 p.m.
On 15 Apr 2010, at 12:19, Jozef Hartinger wrote:
Done, the problems are:
ShrinkWrap API (alpha5) targets Java 1.6
- currently breaks drools, international and jms modules
Andy, what do you think about making Shrinkwrap target Java 5, not Java 6?
If you don't want to do this, I think we can still have the modules target Java 5 for
runtime, but require Java 6 for testing. It's just harder in the Hudson setup :-)
jboss-ejb3-api-3.1.0.jar targets Java 1.6
- currently breaks envconfig module
Shelly, is it possible we can compile this API with Java 5? Or have a Java 5 version?
Are your new spec APIs (which we should switch to...) Java 5 or Java 6?
Other compilation problems
- Faces https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/SEAMFACES-13
- Remoting https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/SEAMREMOTING-3
On 04/15/2010 12:23 PM, Pete Muir wrote:
> Yes.
>
> On 15 Apr 2010, at 08:54, Jozef Hartinger wrote:
>
>> I set the CI jobs to run on JDK 5. Should also the snapshots that are published
to the maven repository be built with JDK 5?
>>
>> On 04/13/2010 03:32 PM, Pete Muir wrote:
>>> Just to remind everyone (not sure if this is a problem or not atm ;-) but all
Seam modules should be developed using Java 5 unless there is a strong reason to use Java
6. We should used the Hudson jobs to ensure that the code builds with Java 5.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> seam-dev mailing list
>>> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>
2:27 p.m.
On 15 Apr 2010, at 13:17, Pete Muir wrote:
On 15 Apr 2010, at 12:19, Jozef Hartinger wrote:
> Done, the problems are:
>
> ShrinkWrap API (alpha5) targets Java 1.6
> - currently breaks drools, international and jms modules
Andy, what do you think about making Shrinkwrap target Java 5, not Java 6?
If you don't want to do this, I think we can still have the modules target Java 5 for
runtime, but require Java 6 for testing. It's just harder in the Hudson setup :-)
Oops, Jaikiran already answered this :-)
>
> jboss-ejb3-api-3.1.0.jar targets Java 1.6
> - currently breaks envconfig module
Shelly, is it possible we can compile this API with Java 5? Or have a Java 5 version?
Are your new spec APIs (which we should switch to...) Java 5 or Java 6?
>
> Other compilation problems
> - Faces https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/SEAMFACES-13
> - Remoting https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/SEAMREMOTING-3
>
>
> On 04/15/2010 12:23 PM, Pete Muir wrote:
>> Yes.
>>
>> On 15 Apr 2010, at 08:54, Jozef Hartinger wrote:
>>
>>> I set the CI jobs to run on JDK 5. Should also the snapshots that are
published to the maven repository be built with JDK 5?
>>>
>>> On 04/13/2010 03:32 PM, Pete Muir wrote:
>>>> Just to remind everyone (not sure if this is a problem or not atm ;-) but
all Seam modules should be developed using Java 5 unless there is a strong reason to use
Java 6. We should used the Hudson jobs to ensure that the code builds with Java 5.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> seam-dev mailing list
>>>> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>>
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
4:10 p.m.
On 04/15/2010 08:17 AM, Pete Muir wrote:
On 15 Apr 2010, at 12:19, Jozef Hartinger wrote:
> Done, the problems are:
>
> ShrinkWrap API (alpha5) targets Java 1.6
> - currently breaks drools, international and jms modules
Andy, what do you think about making Shrinkwrap target Java 5, not Java 6?
As of ShrinkWrap 1.0.0-alpha-6, we support Java5 runtimes (JDK6 required
for compilation):
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/SHRINKWRAP-131
Will this suffice?
S,
ALR
If you don't want to do this, I think we can still have the modules target Java 5 for
runtime, but require Java 6 for testing. It's just harder in the Hudson setup :-)
>
> jboss-ejb3-api-3.1.0.jar targets Java 1.6
> - currently breaks envconfig module
Shelly, is it possible we can compile this API with Java 5? Or have a Java 5 version?
Are your new spec APIs (which we should switch to...) Java 5 or Java 6?
>
> Other compilation problems
> - Faces https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/SEAMFACES-13
> - Remoting https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/SEAMREMOTING-3
>
>
> On 04/15/2010 12:23 PM, Pete Muir wrote:
>> Yes.
>>
>> On 15 Apr 2010, at 08:54, Jozef Hartinger wrote:
>>
>>> I set the CI jobs to run on JDK 5. Should also the snapshots that are
published to the maven repository be built with JDK 5?
>>>
>>> On 04/13/2010 03:32 PM, Pete Muir wrote:
>>>> Just to remind everyone (not sure if this is a problem or not atm ;-) but
all Seam modules should be developed using Java 5 unless there is a strong reason to use
Java 6. We should used the Hudson jobs to ensure that the code builds with Java 5.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> seam-dev mailing list
>>>> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>>
--
Andrew Lee Rubinger
Sr. Software Engineer
JBoss by Red Hat
http://exitcondition.alrubinger.com
http://twitter.com/ALRubinger
4:13 p.m.
On 15 Apr 2010, at 15:10, Andrew Lee Rubinger wrote:
On 04/15/2010 08:17 AM, Pete Muir wrote:
>
> On 15 Apr 2010, at 12:19, Jozef Hartinger wrote:
>
>> Done, the problems are:
>>
>> ShrinkWrap API (alpha5) targets Java 1.6
>> - currently breaks drools, international and jms modules
>
> Andy, what do you think about making Shrinkwrap target Java 5, not Java 6?
As of ShrinkWrap 1.0.0-alpha-6, we support Java5 runtimes (JDK6 required for
compilation):
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/SHRINKWRAP-131
Will this suffice?
Perfect!
5:32 a.m.
Seam faces will be back to Java 5 upon my next commit.
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 15 Apr 2010, at 15:10, Andrew Lee Rubinger wrote:
>
>
> On 04/15/2010 08:17 AM, Pete Muir wrote:
>>
>> On 15 Apr 2010, at 12:19, Jozef Hartinger wrote:
>>
>>> Done, the problems are:
>>>
>>> ShrinkWrap API (alpha5) targets Java 1.6
>>> - currently breaks drools, international and jms modules
>>
>> Andy, what do you think about making Shrinkwrap target Java 5, not Java
6?
>
> As of ShrinkWrap 1.0.0-alpha-6, we support Java5 runtimes (JDK6 required
for compilation):
>
> https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/SHRINKWRAP-131
>
> Will this suffice?
Perfect!
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
--
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.com
http://scrumshark.com
"Keep it Simple"
5184
days inactive
5187
days old
9 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Andrew Lee Rubinger -
Jaikiran Pai -
Jozef Hartinger -
Lincoln Baxter, III -
Pete Muir