Re: [teiid-dev] Embedded Vs Server in the Designer
On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 16:34 -0400, John Doyle wrote:
I understood part of this proposal to be an alternative to the path
designer was taking, and addressing a lot of the complexities of that
approach. Specifically that in this new path 'preview' of physical
and virtual models would be accomplished with an embedded teiid, and
that the user would "Deploy" a VDB to the container to test a VDB via
a DTP connection to Teiid. Do I understanding that your are proposing
that 'preview' of models on a remote Teiid also be supported in the
tooling?
As Teiid team, we want to offer solutions either way. The actual
decision to do one way other is still pending AFAIK.
We found yesterday that ESB tooling seems to be dependent upon the
Server being there, which is similar to current Teiid approach. So,
there are pros and cons in both approaches.
Ramesh..