I think as a result of the previous discussion we got the JCR message store?
Bill Burke wrote:
Mark Little wrote:
> If we were only looking at (i), then JBM would be fine. However,
> we're really looking at (ii). Whether we should use the current
> Message Store to achieve (i) is a different discussion. My 2 cents is
> that we shouldn't: these are really two different entities, even if
> they have the same name.
>
Great, but ESB doesn't need to build (i) because they need (ii). (ii)
seems more to me like a "message warehouse" and a niche use case. I
think the mass-market features and integration are far more important
at this stage of development.
Bill