Re: action framework was Re: [esb-dev] divide and conquer samples?

Bill Burke wrote: > Burr Sutter wrote: >> The "cons" for jBPM-based orchestration: >> - Does require learning of jPDL and jBPM actions. This is not a >> trivial undertaking. > This is a relevant issue, but I think we can refactor base jbpm to > handle the simple usecases. >> - It requires lots of setup & configuration for jBPM such as >> getting the database configured correctly and Hibernate mapped >> correctly. This is not well documented and involves some heavy >> lifting on the part of the user. It is improving but does have a >> real learning curve. >> > I think this is an irrelevant issue. This can be fixed. ESB 4.0 > release had the same problems. Let me expand on this. Burr, we have to stop thinking of other JEMS projects like black boxes. a) Its all open source b) We all work for the same company c) jBPM team is under Mark anyways We need to foster cross-contributors. Bill -- Bill Burke JBoss, a division of Red Hat Inc. _______________________________________________ esb-dev mailing list esb-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/esb-dev