September 2006 - jboss-dev-forums

[Design of JBoss Serialization] - Re: InstantiationException: java.util.HashMap$Values

by bos

Found the source of the problem in business logic external to our model. There the inner class java.util.HashMap$Values, which isn't serializable was used to populate the model through the java.util.Map.values() call. Therefore serialization rightfully fails when attempted. Sorry for the false alarm. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3970992#3970992 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3970992

19 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - how to keep a history of the task's of a process

by dsrkreddy

Dear All I had created a workflow for our project by using jbpm gpd made plugin with eclipse ide . but now i want to create a history of the task's of a process. so is there any way such that i can keep the history of the task's so please help me .... send me any link or any example such that i can keep the history.... Thank's in advance Sam View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3970985#3970985 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3970985

19 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: EPR support in 4.0 GA

by tfennelly

"mark.little(a)jboss.com" wrote : We're talking about EPRs in terms of addresses, not interaction sequences. So the EPR referenced in the link is out-of-date. It'll be more like: | | public class EPR | { | public void setAddr (URI uri); | public URI getAddr () throws URISyntaxException; | public MetaData setters/getters | } Grand. That thread I linked there actually talks about both i.e. it breaks what was the old EPR structure into 2 structures (based on the WS-Addressing spec): 1) A new EPR similar to what you outline above and 2) An Interaction/Invocation structure. Guess we need to discuss this on a seperate thread. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3970984#3970984 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3970984

19 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: EPR support in 4.0 GA

by arvinder

[url] https://svn.labs.jboss.com/labs/jbossesb/trunk/product/etc/schemas/xml/jm... [/url] View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3970982#3970982 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3970982

19 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: EPR support in 4.0 GA

by arvinder

See the following: [url] https://svn.labs.jboss.com/labs/jbossesb/trunk/product/etc/schemas/xml/jm... [/url] I'll create the xsds for the email, ftp and database, then people can comment/discuss[/url] View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3970981#3970981 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3970981

19 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: EPR support in 4.0 GA

by mark.little＠jboss.com

We're talking about EPRs in terms of addresses, not interaction sequences. So the EPR referenced in the link is out-of-date. It'll be more like: public class EPR { public void setAddr (URI uri); public URI getAddr () throws URISyntaxException; public MetaData setters/getters } View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3970980#3970980 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3970980

19 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: EPR support in 4.0 GA

by tfennelly

Are we talking apurely about th EPR URI here, or EPR's wrt Service invocations/interactions in general etc Anyway, there was another thread with EPR related posts that may be of interest to this thread:http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=77543 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3970978#3970978 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3970978

19 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - EPR support in 4.0 GA

by mark.little＠jboss.com

The EPRs we need to support in the GA release will be (at least): JMS, email, FTP and database. Arvinder is going to come up with some suggested EPRs. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3970969#3970969 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3970969

19 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Javassist development Forum] - problen connecting to jboss 4.0.3

by litalh

Hi, I've problem connecting to jboss version 4.0.3. I've replaced my client libraries to the the ones of 4.3.0 but still I'm having some problems connect to it (with jboss 4.0.2 I've no problem). the exception I get is : javax.naming.CommunicationException [Root exception is java.io.InvalidClassException: org.jboss.invocation.InvokerInterceptor; unable to create instance] The list of libraries I'm using is : jboss-client.jar jboss-common-client.jar jboss-j2ee.jar jboss-remoting.jar jbosssx-client.jar jboss-transaction-client.jar jmx-client.jar jmx-invoker-adaptor-client.jar jnp-client.jar Is there a new jar that was added to this version that I might need t o use ? Do you have any other idea for this problem ? Thanks, Lital View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3970948#3970948 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3970948

19 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Semantics of no local for a durable subscription

by timfox

Well, if that is true you will have the some strange effects. E.g. Connection conn1 sends message m1 conn1 creates consumer with no local = true. conn1 sends message m2 consumer closes without receiving anything conn1 sends message m3 conn1 creates consumer with no local = false consumer receives m1 consumer receivers m3 (no m2!!) My opinion is that no local should only apply to the *consumer* of the subscription (the subscriber), not the subscription itself, which is the way it currently is and has been for some time, and passes TCK. I just to wanted to clarify since the spec is a bit fuzzy about this. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3970947#3970947 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3970947

19 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums September 2006