October 2007 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss Build System] - Re: source in localRepository

by pgier

The different timestamps are just when they were created locally, so I don't think they are out of sync as far as content. If you want to make the timestamps match, you could first do mvn dependency:purge-local-repository That should clear out your project dependencies from the local repo, and then you can download them again with the correct timestamps. I'm not sure why maven doesn't download sources by default when they are available. Maybe because it would slow down the initial build a little bit if you just want to build and don't care about the sources. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4097480#4097480 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4097480

18 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: metadata simplication

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

I guess the main argument for having x.merge(...) merge into x is is that if you don't have jboss a metadata instance to merge you have strange code vs just passing in null: | // Merge from empty self into self with spec | JBossObject x = new JBossObject(); | x.merge(x, spec); | | // Vs, merge spec | x.merge(null, spec); | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4097470#4097470 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4097470

18 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: metadata simplication

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

JBossMetaData.getEnterpriseBeans() should return a JBossEnterpriseBeansMetaData, which implements IEnterpriseBeansMetaData. For the raw parsing output this should be the jboss.xml contents. To create the merged view we do need to create a new JBossMetaData instance and merge the jboss and spec parse results, so we agree there. In terms of having the override associated with the jboss version of the metadata, its not really needed and could be dropped. I do think we do need the merge logic between the spec and jboss classes in the various classes for ease of maintence. I don't have a strong prefernce for merging into this vs one of the arguments. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4097454#4097454 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4097454

18 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossXB] - Re: Collections with interfaces

by alex.loubyansky＠jboss.com

The CCE happens if I rollback Scott's change. It's the same problem with collections we had, i.e. we cannot specify the collection impl we want to use currently. It's easy to fix though by adding a new annotation. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4097451#4097451 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4097451

18 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: metadata simplication

by wolfc

What should JBossMetaData.getEnterpriseBeans() return? Or is that based on whether overriden is set? If not, return original, if so return merged? It sounds doable, but won't we end up with some troublesome logic in the classes? I would rather have a new object graph containing the merged metadata. Both originals (spec & jboss) are then still available (and untouched). View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4097443#4097443 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4097443

18 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossXB] - Re: Collections with interfaces

by alex.loubyansky＠jboss.com

There should be a CCE since XB uses ArrayList as the default collection impl. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4097442#4097442 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4097442

18 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossXB] - Re: Collections with interfaces

by wolfc

I was also looking at trying to add XmlTransient to getEnterpriseBeansMetaData on IEnterpriseBeanMetaData. The actual problem is that JBossMetaData.setEnterpriseBeans doesn't define a class. I've fixed that. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4097431#4097431 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4097431

18 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: metadata simplication

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

The point of having the override is to allow for serializing the data back out to the original source(s). NamedMetaDataWithDescriptionGroupWithOverride is for holding uniquely named jboss.xml data that applies to an override. I was trying various things to get the merged view, and ensureOverride is a hack I don't think should be used. Your right, that merged.merge(...) usage is incorrect relative to the current merge method impls. The standardjboss.xml case is a special case of a partial jboss.xml that is handled by the JBossMetaDataWrapper. I don't think we need another merge to support that. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4097426#4097426 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4097426

18 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossXB] - Re: Collections with interfaces

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Ok View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4097424#4097424 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4097424

18 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossXB] - Re: Collections with interfaces

by alex.loubyansky＠jboss.com

I am sure it's this change. I am looking into the issue with the interfaces. To start, I added @XmlTransient to getEnterpriseBeansMetaData on IEnterpriseBeanMetaData. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4097420#4097420 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4097420

18 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums October 2007