October 2007 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: unable to configue smtp server

by kukeltje

wrong forum (and please do not post duplicates) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4097418#4097418 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4097418

18 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossXB] - Re: Collections with interfaces

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Something else caused the regressions as I saw the same error counts with/without this change. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4097417#4097417 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4097417

18 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossCache] - Re: JBCACHE-1153 - structural nodes

by manik.surtani＠jboss.com

WRT transactions, I guess what I mean is, let's not automatically try and deduce whether a node is structural. I.e., let's make developers explicitly make a node resident instead. E.g., | cache.put("/a/b/c", "k", "v"); | cache.getRoot().getChild("/a").setResident(true); | cache.getRoot().getChild("/a/b").setResident(true); | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4097408#4097408 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4097408

18 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: metadata simplication

by wolfc

We're still mixing merging and parsing logic, which to me looks like an unsolvable puzzle. What's the function of the override (NamedMetaDataWithDescriptionGroupWithOverride.data)? Either it's for holding data from the jboss xml parse or it's for referring to the override. IMHO it can't be both. The code now creates a StackOverflow in JBossEnterpriseBean.setDescriptionGroup. (ensureOverride returns a new instance of the same class and calls setDescriptionGroup.) I have changed this part, but as long as the above question is unanswered the solution is by definition wrong. Another thing is the merge method: the current use of the merge is contradicting the implementation. MergeUtil.merge: JBossMetaData merged = new JBossMetaData(); | merged.merge(jboss, spec); | merged.setOverridenMetaData(spec); | return merged; vs for example IdMetaDataImpl: public void merge(IdMetaDataImpl merged, IdMetaDataImpl original) | { | ... | if (id != null) | merged.setId(id); | else if (original.id != null) | merged.setId(original.id); | } where merged is the target. I would rather see this as target (as in MergeUtil) and have the following signature: interface Mergable<M> | void merge(M original, M override); Or maybe only a one-way merge: interface Mergable<M> | void merge(M override); Because the default (non-performant) code is always: void merge(M original, M override) | { | merge(original); | merge(override); | } View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4097391#4097391 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4097391

18 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - Re: When will W3CEndpointReference instance construction be

by jhalliday

Thomas This is becoming a more pressing issue for the web services transactions work. Please could you indicate which release you are going to target it for so we can plan accordingly. Thanks! View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4097385#4097385 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4097385

18 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossXB] - Re: Collections with interfaces

by alex.loubyansky＠jboss.com

It introduced regression in the testsuite. It used be 8 errors and 8 failures. Now it's Tests run: 651, Failures: 7, Errors: 180, Skipped: 0 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4097382#4097382 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4097382

18 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossCache] - Re: JBCACHE-1153 - structural nodes

by mircea.markus

anonymous wrote : I think this can become a problem since even a node with no data still has an overhead and an impact on memory. I think they should still be considered for eviction.at the time the If we consider for eviction such a node, and it gets to be evicted, nothing really happens at that point, unless it is a leaf node. For all non-leafs nodes, the eviction would only empty the attribute map, which in our case is already empty (effect of eviction would be void). I also agree that those nodes are not empty and somehow makes sense counting them as nodes to be evicted, but on the other hand they reduce the benefits of it which is cleaning up memory and allow for other data to be kept there... anonymous wrote : Can't we just use the resident flag for this purpose instead? | we can go on and implement based on this approach. The implementation is a bit trickier due to transactions: | cache.put("/a/b/c","k","v"); | //at this point "/a" and "/a/b" are structural + resident | tx.start() | cache.put("/a/b","k2","v2"); //at this point "/a/b" becomes not-structural | tx.rollback(); | //"/a/b" should not be structural + resident as transaction failed | anonymous wrote : See my comment on http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4097183#4097183 about tombstones and invalid nodes. It shows how you could have empty nodes with no data, that *should* be considered for eviction. I haven't totally get it (Mon morning :) ), let's have a chat View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4097378#4097378 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4097378

18 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: Default window state

by thomas.heute＠jboss.com

I will do #1, actually #1 will implicitly also work since it will be an object property at the end. I'll also check for maximized constraint View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4097362#4097362 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4097362

18 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - unable to configue smtp server

by vishal423

hi everybody, i am new to jboss jbpm. As per user guide, you have to configure jbpm.cfg.xml file for smtp server settings. But it always tries to connect at localhost instead of smtp address that i have configured. thanks in advance. Regards, vishal View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4097361#4097361 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4097361

18 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Build System] - Re: source in localRepository

by wolfc

Shouldn't maven do this by default when dependencies are resolved? Now I end up with: -rw-r--r-- 1 carlo carlo 326543 Oct 12 19:06 jbossxb-2.0.0-SNAPSHOT-sources.jar | -rw-r--r-- 1 carlo carlo 439274 Oct 22 09:21 jbossxb-2.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar Which are out of sync. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4097343#4097343 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4097343

18 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums October 2007