November 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of Embedded JBoss] - Re: JBossAS Changes to Enable Embedded

by ALRubinger

Regarding "moving 'bootstrap'" from AS, I'll probably copy it to the new location, then we can decide whether to use the old module or new component. Then we can use it in EJB3 sooner, and AS can decide when it wants to make the switch (using a patch I'll supply). S, ALR View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4187641#4187641 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4187641

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Embedded JBoss] - Re: JBossAS Changes to Enable Embedded

by ALRubinger

"dimitris(a)jboss.org" wrote : Do you have a sense of time necessary for this type of refactorings? My M.O. is if the following criteria hold: * End-user view does not change * TestSuites do not regress ...then I can make any changes necessary up to GA freeze (resuming after release). :) If anything goes wrong, we revert. That said, component upgrades time is over, so if you want to hold off on moving "bootstrap" module out of AS until after GA is tagged, that's OK. The sooner this is done, the sooner EJB3 may use it for Embeddable EJB 3.1. The JIRAs I mention in the linked Thread can be done before code freeze (as I've already done the bulky work, reordering the dependencies). S, ALR View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4187634#4187634 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4187634

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: creating integration layer

by ataylor

sounds good, I'll do that as well View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4187628#4187628 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4187628

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Embedded JBoss] - Re: JBossAS Changes to Enable Embedded

by dimitris＠jboss.org

Do you have a sense of time necessary for this type of refactorings? Making our bootstrap more plugable/resuable certainly makes sense, but we have to consider we are 2 weeks away from the final code freeze. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4187627#4187627 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4187627

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: JBVFS-67, VFSCacheFactory.getInstance(String defaultCach

by alesj

Thinking about it, VFSCacheFactory::getInstance with just String parameter is not enough. As some VFSCache impls have some parameters that you need to set. e.g. LRUVFSCache needs to take min and max I'll add VFSCacheFactory::getInstance(String, Map), pushing that map into constructor if not null. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4187626#4187626 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4187626

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: creating integration layer

by timfox

We can create a formatter that a) uses log4j b) uses jboss logging c) something else? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4187624#4187624 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4187624

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: creating integration layer

by timfox

http://www.exampledepot.com/egs/java.util.logging/SetFormat.html View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4187623#4187623 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4187623

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re:

by alesj

OK, fixed. I'll do new CR release, making it easy on everybody. Is there any other dot feature out there that I should consider legal? I'll still leave triple '...' and '..somepath' as illegal: | else if (ch == '.') | { | int bufferLength = buffer.length(); | | if (specialToken == null && bufferLength == 0) | specialToken = CURRENT_PATH; | else if (specialToken == CURRENT_PATH && bufferLength == 0) | specialToken = REVERSE_PATH; | else if (specialToken == REVERSE_PATH && bufferLength == 0) | throw new IllegalArgumentException("Illegal token (" + specialToken + ch + ") in path: " + path); | else | buffer.append(ch); | } | else | { | // token starts with '.' or '..', but also has some path after that | if (specialToken != null) | { | // we don't allow tokens after '..' | if (specialToken == REVERSE_PATH) | throw new IllegalArgumentException("Illegal token (" + specialToken + ch + ") in path: " + path); | | // after '.' more path is legal == unix hidden directories | buffer.append(specialToken); | specialToken = null; | } | buffer.append(ch); | } | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4187620#4187620 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4187620

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: creating integration layer

by timfox

"ataylor" wrote : currently Logger is a concrete class. I was thinking of making this an interface and adding a LoggerFactory class for instantiation. Then provide 2 implementations the one we have, currently jboss logging, and a new one which just uses java.util.Logger. The factory would use the jboss one if it was on the classpath and if not fallback to the jdk one. I could also add asys pref check as well. The idea with logging in JBM 2.0 was to always use java.util.Logger so we don't pull in any other dependencies. Then, if someone wants to use log4j or jboss logging, they can provide an "adapter" (I believe JUL logging allows this) which can be configured at run time to be used. We could provide adapters for jboss logging and log4j View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4187618#4187618 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4187618

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: creating integration layer

by ataylor

currently Logger is a concrete class. I was thinking of making this an interface and adding a LoggerFactory class for instantiation. Then provide 2 implementations the one we have, currently jboss logging, and a new one which just uses java.util.Logger. The factory would use the jboss one if it was on the classpath and if not fallback to the jdk one. I could also add asys pref check as well. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4187617#4187617 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4187617

17 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums November 2008