November 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Hotdeployment is still broken

by alesj

I think this is the cause: - https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAS-6148 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4191248#4191248 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4191248

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Missing org.jnp.server.NamingServer_Stub

by adrian＠jboss.org

"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | But a 4.2.x -> 5.0.x lookup fails because of the new interface: | | | | javax.naming.CommunicationException: Failed to connect to server 127.0.0.1:1099 [Root exception is java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.jnp.interfaces.NamingEvents (no security manager: RMI class loader disabled)] | | org.jnp.interfaces.NamingContext.getServer(NamingContext.java:274) | | org.jnp.interfaces.NamingContext.checkRef(NamingContext.java:1533) | | org.jnp.interfaces.NamingContext.lookup(NamingContext.java:634) | | org.jnp.interfaces.NamingContext.lookup(NamingContext.java:627) | | javax.naming.InitialContext.lookup(InitialContext.java:351) | | Adding that class in a jar to server/xxx/lib in 4.2.x allows the lookup to work. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4191247#4191247 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4191247

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Hotdeployment is still broken

by adrian＠jboss.org

If I change a jsp page it shouldn't be redeploying the war file! View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4191245#4191245 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4191245

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Missing org.jnp.server.NamingServer_Stub

by adrian＠jboss.org

"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | Can you try getting jboss-4.2.x to ignore stub classes and always use dynamic proxies? | i.e. start jboss-4.2.x with -Djava.rmi.server.ignoreStubClasses=true If I do that, then a 5.0.x -> 4.2.x lookup works. Here's a simple jsp page (you'll need to change the provider url) | <%@page contentType="text/html" | import="java.util.Properties,javax.naming.*" | %> | | <% | Properties props = new Properties(); | props.put("java.naming.factory.initial", "org.jnp.interfaces.NamingContextFactory"); | props.put("java.naming.factory.url.pkgs", "org.jboss.naming:org.jnp.interfaces"); | props.put("java.naming.provider.url", "127.0.0.1:1099"); | InitialContext ctx = new InitialContext(props); | Object obj = ctx.lookup("jmx/rmi/RMIAdaptor"); | %> | <body> | Got <%= obj %> of type <%= obj.getClass() %> | <body> | </body> | </html> | But a 4.2.x -> 5.0.x lookup fails because of the new interface: | javax.naming.CommunicationException: Failed to connect to server 127.0.0.1:1099 [Root exception is java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.jnp.interfaces.NamingEvents (no security manager: RMI class loader disabled)] | org.jnp.interfaces.NamingContext.getServer(NamingContext.java:274) | org.jnp.interfaces.NamingContext.checkRef(NamingContext.java:1533) | org.jnp.interfaces.NamingContext.lookup(NamingContext.java:634) | org.jnp.interfaces.NamingContext.lookup(NamingContext.java:627) | javax.naming.InitialContext.lookup(InitialContext.java:351) | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4191244#4191244 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4191244

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: Privileged Blocks Issue : JBAOP-675

by flavia.rainone＠jboss.com

Anil, taking a second look, I have a question. Are you running tests with pre-woven code? If this code is already woven, it is already calling AspectManager.getAdvisor. So, it won't help making aopc change this behavior if you need to make things work with somethinig that is already woven. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4191243#4191243 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4191243

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Missing org.jnp.server.NamingServer_Stub

by adrian＠jboss.org

"dimitris(a)jboss.org" wrote : I've tryied adding org.jnp.server.NamingServer.class in jnp-client.jar but the error remaims the same: | If my guesses above are true, then JBoss5 needs the stub class in the server jar if it wants to talk to 4.2.x jndi (and stub classes haven't been disabled for it). View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4191242#4191242 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4191242

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Missing org.jnp.server.NamingServer_Stub

by adrian＠jboss.org

"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | Which way around is this test? It's not clear from the above description. | The old stub should be available in 4.2.x without the new interface methods? | I think this is 5.0.x lookup 4.2.x isn't it? If you look at 4.2.x the server isn't using the dynamic proxy because the stub exists on the server. | 2008-11-21 13:16:46,000 DEBUG [org.jboss.naming.Naming] NamingServer stub: NamingServer_Stub[UnicastRef2 [liveRef: [endpoint:[127.0.0.1:1098,org.jboss.net.sockets.Defa | ultSocketFactory@e048aaa4[bindAddress=/127.0.0.1]](local),objID:[0]]]] | So if the server used the stub class then the client must also do the same. Can you try getting jboss-4.2.x to ignore stub classes and always use dynamic proxies? i.e. start jboss-4.2.x with -Djava.rmi.server.ignoreStubClasses=true View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4191240#4191240 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4191240

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Missing org.jnp.server.NamingServer_Stub

by adrian＠jboss.org

It is using the dynamic proxy which you can see from the logging when it binds the stub: | 2008-11-21 13:06:31,807 DEBUG [org.jboss.naming.Naming] (main) Creating NamingServer stub, theServer=MBeanProxyExt[jboss:service=NamingBeanImpl],rmiPort=1098,clientSoc | ketFactory=null,serverSocketFactory=org.jboss.net.sockets.DefaultSocketFactory(a)e048aaa4[bindAddress=/127.0.0.1] | 2008-11-21 13:06:32,082 DEBUG [org.jboss.naming.Naming] (main) NamingServer stub: Proxy[Naming,RemoteObjectInvocationHandler[UnicastRef2 [liveRef: [endpoint:[127.0.0.1 | :1098,org.jboss.net.sockets.DefaultSocketFactory@e048aaa4[bindAddress=/127.0.0.1]](local),objID:[0]]]]] | My guess is that it can't deserialze the proxy because there is a new interface not in 4.2.x i.e. org.jnp.interfaces.NamingEvents so it is falling back to trying to use the stub? Which way around is this test? It's not clear from the above description. The old stub should be available in 4.2.x without the new interface methods? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4191238#4191238 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4191238

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Classloader-Registry in AS/ESB allows one central jbpm i

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

merci (f) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4191235#4191235 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4191235

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: Privileged Blocks Issue : JBAOP-675

by flavia.rainone＠jboss.com

Yes, this is doable. I think I'll go with the first suggestion. I still would like to know which part of line 707 of AspectManager is triggering a security check... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4191233#4191233 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4191233

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums November 2008