November 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Missing org.jnp.server.NamingServer_Stub

by dimitris＠jboss.org

I've tryied adding org.jnp.server.NamingServer.class in jnp-client.jar but the error remaims the same: | Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.jnp.server.NamingServer_Stub (no security manager: RMI class loader disabled) | at sun.rmi.server.LoaderHandler.loadClass(LoaderHandler.java:371) | at sun.rmi.server.LoaderHandler.loadClass(LoaderHandler.java:165) | at java.rmi.server.RMIClassLoader$2.loadClass(RMIClassLoader.java:620) | at java.rmi.server.RMIClassLoader.loadClass(RMIClassLoader.java:247) | at sun.rmi.server.MarshalInputStream.resolveClass(MarshalInputStream.java:197) | at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readNonProxyDesc(ObjectInputStream.java:1544) | at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readClassDesc(ObjectInputStream.java:1466) | at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readOrdinaryObject(ObjectInputStream.java:1699) | at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject0(ObjectInputStream.java:1305) | at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject(ObjectInputStream.java:348) | at java.rmi.MarshalledObject.get(MarshalledObject.java:135) | at org.jnp.interfaces.NamingContext.getServer(NamingContext.java:290) | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4191227#4191227 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4191227

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Is ParameterizedClassInfo serialization broken

by adrian＠jboss.org

"alesj" wrote : | | | ClassInfo typeInfo = (ClassInfo) factory.getTypeInfo(clazz); | | ClassInfo superClassInfo = typeInfo.getGenericSuperclass(); // <-- PCI | | | | ClassInfo tmp = superClassInfo; | | superClassInfo = serializeDeserialize(superClassInfo, ClassInfo.class); | | assertEquals(tmp, superClassInfo); | | assertEquals(superClassInfo, tmp); | | | so fine by me. :-) Well I guess that depends upon what "clazz" is :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4191224#4191224 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4191224

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - jBPM 3.3 GA feedback in the user forum

by kukeltje

Guys, There is some feedback coming in in the user forum regarding jBPM 3.3 GA. Basically it focuses around the installer and to some extend related to the docs. Some remarks: - The 3.3 release is not in line with the getting started docs. - People expect to be able to use jBPM out of the box when the installer has run. - - Database correctly configured - - Database populated - How to install on a headless server The first item is already in Jira as Thomas reopened https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBPM-1727. Regarding the database, I tend to agree with the users. It is not really visible in any warning or doc (at least not that I found). This could be partly solved by the previous item, but in my opinion, we should provide a screen in the installer that asks for username, password and e.g. database url and preconfigure that and populate the database (as is the case with HSQLDB, but not done via sql scripts An option for a headless install is another one. The fact that the automatic install script can be used for this with e.g. just changing the install path in the generated file and how to use it should be documented. I'll make Jira issues of these in the weekend, but thought I'd initially share them here. Stay tuned for (hopefully not) more View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4191218#4191218 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4191218

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: VFS Permissions - JBMICROCONT-149

by alesj

"alesj" wrote : | I'll enable this in InMemoryClassesDeployer, | so the user can determine its own predictable/repeatable name. | https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBDEPLOY-133 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4191217#4191217 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4191217

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Is ParameterizedClassInfo serialization broken

by alesj

"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | Well obviously its broken unless this works: | Well, this works | ClassInfo typeInfo = (ClassInfo) factory.getTypeInfo(clazz); | ClassInfo superClassInfo = typeInfo.getGenericSuperclass(); // <-- PCI | | ClassInfo tmp = superClassInfo; | superClassInfo = serializeDeserialize(superClassInfo, ClassInfo.class); | assertEquals(tmp, superClassInfo); | assertEquals(superClassInfo, tmp); | so fine by me. :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4191213#4191213 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4191213

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Is ParameterizedClassInfo serialization broken

by adrian＠jboss.org

"alesj" wrote : | Is this expected behavior (the first, not NPE :-))? | Well obviously its broken unless this works: | ParameterizedClassInfo pci = ... | ParameterizedClassInfo pci2 = serializeDeserialize(pci, ParameterizedClassInfo.class); | assertEquals(pci, pci2); | That's usually the serialization contract (but not always ;-). View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4191208#4191208 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4191208

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Classloader-Registry in AS/ESB allows one central jbpm i

by camunda

You are right, this was just a first shot. But the information was moved into this blog entry: http://www.bpm-guide.de/2008/10/16/jbpm-deployer-for-jbpm-in-enterprise-e... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4191205#4191205 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4191205

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Classloader-Registry in AS/ESB allows one central jbpm i

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

Hi Bernd, this http://www.camunda.com/content/jbpm/esb/jbpm-esb-classloading.pdf is not acceible any more View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4191202#4191202 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4191202

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Is ParameterizedClassInfo serialization broken

by alesj

Looking at ParameterizedClassInfo, I have a few doubts about its serialization. | public class ParameterizedClassInfo extends DelegateClassInfo | { | /** The serialVersionUID */ | private static final long serialVersionUID = 2; | | /** The factory */ | protected transient IntrospectionTypeInfoFactoryImpl factory; | | /** The parameterized type */ | transient ParameterizedType parameterizedType; | | /** The owner type */ | private TypeInfo ownerType = ClassInfoImpl.UNKNOWN_TYPE; | | /** The type arguments */ | private TypeInfo[] typeArguments = ClassInfoImpl.UNKNOWN_TYPES; | | /** The component type */ | private transient TypeInfo componentType = ClassInfoImpl.UNKNOWN_TYPE; | | /** The key type */ | private transient TypeInfo keyType = ClassInfoImpl.UNKNOWN_TYPE; | | /** The key type */ | private transient TypeInfo valueType = ClassInfoImpl.UNKNOWN_TYPE; | | /** | * Create a new ParameterizedClassInfo. | * | * @param factory the factory | * @param delegate the raw array info | * @param parameterizedType the parameterized type | */ | public ParameterizedClassInfo(IntrospectionTypeInfoFactoryImpl factory, ClassInfo delegate, ParameterizedType parameterizedType) | { | super(delegate); | this.factory = factory; | this.delegate = delegate; | this.parameterizedType = parameterizedType; | } | | public TypeInfoFactory getTypeInfoFactory() | { | return factory; | } | | @Override | public TypeInfo[] getActualTypeArguments() | { | if (typeArguments == ClassInfoImpl.UNKNOWN_TYPES) | typeArguments = factory.getActualTypeArguments(this); | return typeArguments; | } | | @Override | public TypeInfo getOwnerType() | { | if (ownerType == ClassInfoImpl.UNKNOWN_TYPE) | ownerType = factory.getOwnerType(this); | return ownerType; | } | | @Override | public ClassInfo getRawType() | { | return delegate; | } | | @Override | public TypeInfo getComponentType() | { | if (componentType == ClassInfoImpl.UNKNOWN_TYPE) | componentType = factory.getComponentType(this); | return componentType; | } | | @Override | public TypeInfo getKeyType() | { | if (keyType == ClassInfoImpl.UNKNOWN_TYPE); | keyType = factory.getKeyType(this); | return keyType; | } | | @Override | public TypeInfo getValueType() | { | if (valueType == ClassInfoImpl.UNKNOWN_TYPE) | valueType = factory.getValueType(this); | return valueType; | } | After serialization, componentType, keyType, valueType are all gonna be null == not ClassInfoImpl.UNKNOWN_TYPE, hence null would be returned. Even if they were equal to ClassInfoImpl.UNKNOWN_TYPE, NPE would be thrown due to factory being null. Is this expected behavior (the first, not NPE :-))? ps: just saw that there is ';' at the end of 'if' in getKeyType :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4191191#4191191 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4191191

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: Failing 'factory' tests

by wolfc

Ah, you still can't contemplate that I might even have left a bug there for you to spot. ;-) https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAS-6229 "Much to learn you still have" View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4191183#4191183 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4191183

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums November 2008