November 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Changes on the JBM stack on JBoss5

by bstansberry＠jboss.com

And please provide instructions on how to run it as a single test. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4189625#4189625 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4189625

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Changes on the JBM stack on JBoss5

by bstansberry＠jboss.com

Is the version of this test that is expected to work currently checked in on Branch_Stable? If not, send it to me, including any required resource files. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4189623#4189623 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4189623

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Changes on the JBM stack on JBoss5

by timfox

"clebert.suconic(a)jboss.com" wrote : "timfox" wrote : I think this is more of a JGroups question than a messaging question. | | True, but the semantic changed and it is affecting JBM. | | I tried all the possible current alternatives using the multiplexor, and I can' t get multiple channels inside the same VM to see each other. My point is, if JGroups behaviour has changed between releases, one of the JGroups team can probably advise you better on what has changed and how to deal with it than one of the JBM team :) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4189622#4189622 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4189622

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Changes on the JBM stack on JBoss5

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

"timfox" wrote : I think this is more of a JGroups question than a messaging question. True, but the semantic changed and it is affecting JBM. I tried all the possible current alternatives using the multiplexor, and I can' t get multiple channels inside the same VM to see each other. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4189621#4189621 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4189621

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Changes on the JBM stack on JBoss5

by bstansberry＠jboss.com

"bstansberry(a)jboss.com" wrote : Use loopback="true"; I'll post details as to why on Design of Clustering forum in a while and add a link to the post here. Promised post as to why loopback="true" is a good default: http://www.jboss.org/community/docs/DOC-10920 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4189600#4189600 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4189600

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Netty HTTP transport

by ataylor

Thats all done now Trustin, Ive left the charset encoding for you to do at a later date. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4189578#4189578 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4189578

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Why ServerSessionImpl::doHandleCreateQueue is not callin

by timfox

If you can think of a better way of doing this that does not involve maintaining allowable addresses I am open to suggestions. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4189574#4189574 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4189574

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Changes on the JBM stack on JBoss5

by timfox

I think this is more of a JGroups question than a messaging question. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4189573#4189573 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4189573

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Changes on the JBM stack on JBoss5

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

We have another problem to solve now. The latest JGroups (not sure if 2.6.7 or 2.6.6) changed one semantic over the channels. We have a test that instantiate several channels inside the same VM. Before this was working fine, but now I can't connect more than one channel on the same singletonName on the stack. I have removed the singleton attribute but then the channels are not seeing each other. I create multiple stacks (one for each instance) and they don't see each other either. How can someone create multiple connected JChannels on the UDP inside the same VM for tests? For the Record, the test I have problem now is ClusteredPostOfficeTest. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4189551#4189551 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4189551

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Remoting, Unified Invokers] - Re: Remoting 3: Beta release imminent

by david.lloyd＠jboss.com

I think we'll want to change the packaging somehow. I think the standalone classes should be merged into API for sure. API, and core should remain separate for classloading reasons... util should probably be split among core and API rather than being wholly in the API. So in the end there should be: jboss-remoting-api.jar <- api plus standalone and some util jboss-remoting-core.jar <- core plus some util (maybe these should be merged to one module) jboss-remoting-transporter.jar <- transporter jboss-remoting-multiplex.jar <- multiplex transport I dunno, needs more thinking I guess. What do you guys think? Also, gotta remember to get COPYING.txt in all of those... and source JAR targets too. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4189538#4189538 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4189538

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums November 2008