November 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Why ServerSessionImpl::doHandleCreateQueue is not callin

by jmesnil

"clebert.suconic(a)jboss.com" wrote : | JMSServerManagerImpl is creating a destination when Queues are created: | | ... | | While ServerSessionImpl::doHandleCreateQueue is only creating the binding. | | The two bits of code are not on the same level: JMSServerManager creates a *JMS* Queue (which implies the creation of a destination for the corresponding core queue) while ServerSessionImpl creates a *core* queue View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4189446#4189446 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4189446

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Why ServerSessionImpl::doHandleCreateQueue is not callin

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

Ok.. I see on inconsistence then between two different methods for creating Queues. On JMSServerManagerImpl.createQueue and ServerSessionImpl.doHandleCreateQueue. JMSServerManagerImpl is creating a destination when Queues are created: public boolean createQueue(final String queueName, final String jndiBinding) throws Exception | { | JBossQueue jBossQueue = new JBossQueue(queueName); | postOffice.addDestination(jBossQueue.getSimpleAddress(), true); | messagingServer.createQueue(jBossQueue.getAddress(), jBossQueue.getAddress()); | While ServerSessionImpl::doHandleCreateQueue is only creating the binding. | | public void doHandleCreateQueue(final SessionCreateQueueMessage packet) | { | SimpleString address = packet.getAddress(); | | SimpleString queueName = packet.getQueueName(); | | SimpleString filterString = packet.getFilterString(); | | boolean temporary = packet.isTemporary(); | | boolean durable = packet.isDurable(); | | boolean fanout = packet.isFanout(); | | Packet response = null; | | try | { | // make sure the user has privileges to create this queue | if (!postOffice.containsDestination(address)) | { | securityStore.check(address, CheckType.CREATE, this); | } | | Binding binding = postOffice.getBinding(queueName); | | if (binding != null) | { | throw new MessagingException(MessagingException.QUEUE_EXISTS); | } | | Filter filter = null; | | if (filterString != null) | { | filter = new FilterImpl(filterString); | } | | binding = postOffice.addBinding(address, queueName, filter, durable, temporary, fanout); | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4189441#4189441 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4189441

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: xml persistent format for attachments

by sacha.labourey＠jboss.com

Well, glad you are raising this :) This is exactly what I was trying to say to Emmanuel the other day coming back from lunch but failed to expose with such precise terminology. Seems much easier to me. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4189420#4189420 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4189420

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: xml persistent format for attachments

by adrian＠jboss.org

Sorry to interrupt your flow of conversation, but I was thinking about this last night. Why are you trying to serialize the attachments? Wouldn't it be more logical to serialize the ManagedObject and then recreate the attachment from that? I imagine its a lot easier to write a single MO <-> xml marshaller/unmarshaller than to do the same for all metadata (especially when some of it may have been created by thirdparties so we have no control of the actual attachment classes). In terms of MO<->xml all you need to do is marshal the value of the fields which are a small list of known MetaTypes/Values. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4189419#4189419 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4189419

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: xml persistent format for attachments

by emuckenhuber

I've added some JAXB annotations plus adapters to the ServiceDeployment and a basic marshalling/unmarshalling testcase. http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/trunk/testsuite/src/main/org/jboss... As mentioned before, if the initial parsing is done as it's now it now works to marshal/unmarshal the flattened serviceDeployment metadata and services with the JAXBAttachmentSerializer. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4189415#4189415 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4189415

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: creating integration layer

by jmesnil

i've readded the broken integration test correctly this time. sorry guys... As an aside, the integration tests runs fairly quickly except for the XXRandomFailoverTest which takes 75% of the time (16 min on a 22 min run) Given their random natures, couldn't we move them to their own Ant targets and let Hudson deals with these tests? wdyt? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4189392#4189392 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4189392

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - JBoss ESB 4.5 GA release schedule

by Kevin.Conner＠jboss.com

The team are starting to look at the next project release of the ESB 4.x stream and will shortly begin development in earnest. The proposed schedule is as follows Requirements and new functionality now - 28th November Discuss requirements and select development tasks that are to be included in the next project release. This will primarily focus on feature requests and improvements to current capabilities. Development 1st December - 30th January Main development tasks will progress, except for holiday period and f2f meeting. During this phase we will accept additional bug fix requests but most feature requests will be postponed to the next release. Testing February 2nd - February 13th Testing of the codebase with critical bug fixes being accepted. Release February 13th. If you have any suggestions for new functionality, or enhancements to the current codebase, then please let us know about them by creating a JIRA request and setting the 'fix version' to '4.5 feature requests'. Thanks, ESB team View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4189363#4189363 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4189363

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Why ServerSessionImpl::doHandleCreateQueue is not callin

by timfox

The reason is, we need some way to denote the existence of a topic. JMS API requires IllegalDestinationException to be thrown when routing to a topic that doesn't exist. A topic with no subscriptions would otherwise be indistinguishable from no topic. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4189352#4189352 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4189352

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: Fixing classloading issues in jBPM with CL-Registry?

by camunda

I have created a JIRA issue on the SOA platform for this and posted my current code in our blog: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/SOA-1008 http://www.bpm-guide.de/2008/10/16/jbpm-deployer-for-jbpm-in-enterprise-e... http://www.bpm-guide.de/2008/11/14/jbpm-deployer-status-and-sourcecode/ View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4189334#4189334 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4189334

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Classloader-Registry in AS/ESB allows one central jbpm i

by camunda

I have created a JIRA issue on the SOA platform for this and posted my current code in our blog: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/SOA-1008 http://www.bpm-guide.de/2008/10/16/jbpm-deployer-for-jbpm-in-enterprise-e... http://www.bpm-guide.de/2008/11/14/jbpm-deployer-status-and-sourcecode/ View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4189333#4189333 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4189333

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums November 2008