May 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: Inconsistent usage of the Ejb3Deployment.deploymentScope

by bstansberry＠jboss.com

It's including an "ear=xxx" attribute in the ObjectName even though there is no ear, and is using the jar name as the attribute value. This comes from o.j.e.javaee.JavaEEComponentHelper.createObjectName(JavaEEModule module, ...) | StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(Ejb3Module.BASE_EJB3_JMX_NAME + ","); | JavaEEApplication ear = module.getApplication(); | if (ear != null) | { | sb.append("ear="); | sb.append(ear.getName()); | sb.append(","); | } | ..... | The general concern I have is that existing code expects Ejb3Deployment.getApplication() and getEar() to return null if there is no ear involved. The above is the only usage I find for getApplication(). Searching for other uses of Ejb3Deployment.getEar() I find them in DeploymentPersistenceUnitResolver.getPersistenceUnitDeployment(), in the PersistenceUnitDeployment() constructor and in ProxyFactoryHelper.getDeploymentSummaryFromContainer(). View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4150489#4150489 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4150489

17 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: organization of the enterprise module

by alex.guizar＠jboss.com

The current status: * QA: currently there are two tests, one for a one-shot timer and one for a repeating timer. No tests exist for JTA synchronization in the case of either success or failure. I will backport those from the PVM enteprise tests. * Configuration: seems done, pending the result of the additional tests. * Documentation: absent. * Migration: you mean, from the session bean approach? Please give me more details. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4150487#4150487 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4150487

17 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: Proxy Tasks for Delegation

by ALRubinger

"wolfc" wrote : I still don't see the need for any registries. We got enough of those lying around (kernel registry and JNDI itself). Likewise start and stop semantics are then handled by MC. Both MC and JNDI are specific to the current JVM; abstracting the Registry allows for resources to be defined by key locally only, and maintained elsewhere. This allows us to provide custom load-balancing by distributing EJB lookups, proxy creation, and invocation among different physical machines or clusters. The Registry itself is an MC Bean; one objective of this component is to leverage MC wherever possible. S, ALR View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4150484#4150484 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4150484

17 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: Inconsistent usage of the Ejb3Deployment.deploymentScope

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Right, deployment scope has changed to be a resolving facade notion. What is the problem with the object names? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4150481#4150481 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4150481

17 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Inconsistent usage of the Ejb3Deployment.deploymentScope fie

by bstansberry＠jboss.com

Seeing some inconsistent usage of the org.jboss.ejb3.Ejb3Deployment class' deploymentScope field. This may be just due to ongoing refactoring, but want to point it out. Looks like Ejb3Deployment treats the deploymentScope field as indicating the presence of an ear in the deployment -- see the getEar() and getApplication() methods which return it. But looking at Ejb3Deployer.deploy() in the AS, it looks like a JBoss5DeploymentScope will be created and passed to the Ejb3Deployment whether or not the deployment is an ear. One place this shows up is in the creation of ObjectNames for beans. For example, deploying a bean named VMTrackerBean in a clusteredsession-test.jar with no enclosing ear results in the following object name for the bean: jboss.j2ee:ear=clusteredsession-test.jar,jar=clusteredsession-test.jar,name=VMTrackerBean,service=EJB3 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4150478#4150478 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4150478

17 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: MaxIO, MinFiles and JournalFileSize

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

"ataylor" wrote : anonymous wrote : I really want to keep freeFiles closed. | Is there something stopping us from doing this? Yes.. Tim Fox! :-D View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4150476#4150476 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4150476

17 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: MaxIO, MinFiles and JournalFileSize

by ataylor

anonymous wrote : I really want to keep freeFiles closed. Is there something stopping us from doing this? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4150474#4150474 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4150474

17 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: MaxIO, MinFiles and JournalFileSize

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

I really want to keep freeFiles closed. With that we can have as many free files as we want without having the side effect of this formula: NumberOfOpenedFiles * MAX_AIO_PER_FILE <= GLOBAL_MAX_AIO As for now, I have made MAX_AIO = 2000, so our testsuite can complete without any problems. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4150471#4150471 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4150471

17 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: MaxIO, MinFiles and JournalFileSize

by ataylor

whatever the best configuration turns out to be, we need document this well and have multiple examples for different scenarios that a user can easily switch between without having to fully understand the ins and outs AIO. i.e. best config for heavy throughput, low throughput with large messages etc etc. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4150463#4150463 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4150463

17 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Combined codec and packet

by timfox

For now I have replaced the default implementation with our own implementation based on a ConcurrentHashMap and this has alleviated the point of contention. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4150462#4150462 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4150462

17 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums May 2008