July 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss ESB] - JBoss ESB Performance/optimal configurations

by Busrider2008

Been working with prototypes and some quickstarts from the JBoss ESB 4.3 GA application server and I have been a little confused with all the options of JBossMQ, JBossMessaging, using ActiveMQ with the ESB, and using straight vanilla JMS outside the bus. Running some initial tests for performance on a series of actions in my test service (display message, Smooks transformation, XML2 Pojo, and dislaynewmessage) just so I can see where some bottlenecks might be...I am seeing that using the ESB with ActiveMQ as the JMS provider looks to be quickest per action. The monitoring console available on localhost:8080 shows each ESB and has success, failure threads, and processing time. First question, the numbers for processing time are in what unit of time? Second question, what is the suggested optimal configuration using the ESB? Maxthreads per JMS Listener? I have not seen a good thread yet on numbers people are seeing playing with different providers and libraries. I will continue to profile the time for processing using JProbe with filtering by particular methods, but any suggestions would be great in the meantime. Thanks! View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4165741#4165741 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4165741

17 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of the JBoss EJB Container] - JBOSS 5.0 + SQL SERVER 2005 = ClassNotFoundException: com.mi

by szymanski

Hi friends, I'm trying to use JBOSS 5.0 with MS SQLSERVER 2005, but I'm getting the following error: [JBossManagedConnectionPool] Throwable while attempting to get a new connection: null | org.jboss.resource.JBossResourceException: Could not create connection; - nested throwable: (org.jboss.resource.JBossResourceException: Failed to register driver for: com.microsoft.sqlserver.jdbc.SQLServerDriver; - nested throwable: (java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: com.microsoft.sqlserver.jdbc.SQLServerDriver. I put the lib driver in the server/default/lib folder and my datasource-ds.xml is like this <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> | <datasources> | <local-tx-datasource> | <jndi-name>MSSQLDS</jndi-name> | <connection-url> | jdbc:sqlserver://localhost;instanceName=SQL2005;portNumber=1433;databaseName=question; | </connection-url> | <driver-class> | com.microsoft.sqlserver.jdbc.SQLServerDriver | </driver-class> | <user-name>xxx</user-name> | <password>xxx</password> | <metadata> | <type-mapping>MS SQLSERVER</type-mapping> | </metadata> | </local-tx-datasource> | </datasources> every time that I start the server, I get the error, what hell is going on...? Thanks to everyone. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4165727#4165727 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4165727

17 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Clustering on JBoss] - Re: JBCLUSTER-206 - Extract HB/JBC integration layer from EJ

by galder.zamarreno＠jboss.com

Re: pulling hibernate-testing 3.3. I've just realised that it pulls hibernate core 3.3, so you end up with Hibernate 3.2 and 3.3 in the classpath. I'm reverting back to pulling the classes the test classes that I need from 3.2 into hibernate-jbc-cacheprovider View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4165714#4165714 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4165714

17 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: Problem handling absolute directory specs in classpath

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

"adinn" wrote : However, I would assume that we are not at liberty to define the format of the trailing component. If we let the tokenizer elide all repeated slashes this would make it accept manifest Class-Path entries which had previously been rejected. I don't think we should break any existing standard (whether de jure or de facto) unless we really need to. Right, a uri with a trailing '/' indicates a directory and needs to be reflected in the vfs names. There is no such thing as an empty, nameless directory in the vfs so repeated '/' should be collapsed into a single '/' by the tokenizer. Create a JBVFS issue if you can, currently I can't get in. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4165711#4165711 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4165711

17 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: ManagedObjectAttachmentsImpl::transientManagedObjects no

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Both are logically transient and Adrian is saying they should be physically transient as well in terms of the default java serialization behavior. We used to have: | /** The attachments */ | private transient Attachments transientAttachments = new AttachmentsImpl(); | | /** The managed objects */ | private transient Attachments transientManagedObjects = | GeneratedAOPProxyFactory.createProxy(new AttachmentsImpl(), Attachments.class); | Now transientAttachments exists as ManagedObjectsWithTransientAttachmentsImpl.transientAttachments and is marked transient, and transientManagedObjects exists as ManagedObjectAttachmentsImpl.transientManagedObjects and is not marked transient. Its also no longer an aop proxied instance. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4165709#4165709 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4165709

17 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Need for database compatibility between jBPM versions

by grin1dan

What I would really appreciate is a list (short?) of why jBPM is a better workflow tool than MS WF at this time. TIA. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4165701#4165701 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4165701

17 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: ManagedObjectAttachmentsImpl::transientManagedObjects no

by alesj

"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | Transient attachments should not be serialzied unlike transient managed objects. I'm confused now. :-) The old code had transientManagedObjects transient. Current code doesn't. What should be then? :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4165700#4165700 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4165700

17 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Clustering on JBoss] - Re: JBCLUSTER-206 - Extract HB/JBC integration layer from EJ

by galder.zamarreno＠jboss.com

Indeed. For the time being I've added a dependency on hibernate-testing 3.3.0.CR1 which lets me move forward and tackle the more difficult part of the UT testing, which is making your tests work with JBC 1.x. I've forwarded the thread to Steve but it might take a while for him to come back as he's in Tuscany with the rest of Seam/Hibernate guys. Right, I understand now how that duplication come about. I'll stick to hibernate-testing for the time being. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4165688#4165688 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4165688

17 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Schema for the current BI implementation?

by kukeltje

Heiko, afaik, there was no DB backend for the BI impl. They were just reports generated based on the current data. So in fact it was more of a half BI, half BAM implementation. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4165686#4165686 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4165686

17 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - How to specify which transports are supported

by timfox

I've been doing a refactoring of our remoting layer. I've made a lot of changes and simplifications and I've separated out all our core and generic remoting code - this code has no dependencies on any particular transport implementation e.g. MINA. I have also created a service provider interface package (spi), in a similar way you get JDBC spi, JTA spi etc This is a set of classes which define the contract between out remoting code and the transport itself (e.g. MINA). Basically, to integrate a particular transport provider you need to implement a set of classes which are then used by our remoting code: Acceptor AcceptorFactory Connector ConnectorFactory TransportConnection. This are simple interfaces since the bulk of the code has been moved to the core remoting code which is the same for all transport providers. There are methods on RemotingService and ConnectionRegistry: registerAcceptorFactory(...) unregisterAcceptorFactory(...) registerConnectionFactory(...) unregisterConnectorFactory(...) One remaining unresolved issue is how to tell the RemotingService/ConnectionRegistry which transports it supports (i.e. who calls register?)- currently this is hardcoded, View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4165669#4165669 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4165669

17 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums July 2008