July 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss Remoting, Unified Invokers] - Re: Exception propagation using HTTP servlet transport on 1.

by ananta_a

attribute name="return-exception" isParam="true" true /attribute View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162950#4162950 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162950

17 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Remoting, Unified Invokers] - Re: Exception propagation using HTTP servlet transport on 1.

by ananta_a

true View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162949#4162949 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162949

17 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Remoting, Unified Invokers] - Re: Exception propagation using HTTP servlet transport on 1.

by ananta_a

jboss-service.xml: true View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162948#4162948 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162948

17 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Moving slow tests out into timing

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

"timfox" wrote : | Any tests (e.g. journal tests -clebert) which do nothing apart from measure performance belong neither in the unit test suite nor the timing suite. | I have moved those tests into performance a long time ago. There are though few timing tests, that are creating too many records and they could be simplified. Some of those tests were moved to performance when they should be actually be moved to timing. I'm moving them now. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162947#4162947 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162947

17 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Clustering on JBoss (Clusters/JBoss)] - Re: JBPAPP-863 -- FC blocks during slow failure detection

by vblagojevic＠jboss.com

Hey guys, If you search for "viewAccepted" in jawa04.log (attachment in JBPAPP-863) you will notice that tcp stack cache node does not receive a new view until about 15 min after the pulled plug is reconnected. udp based cache nodes work as expected. Since FC relies on receiving views to function properly we have all the threads blocked in FC#down.... Why do we have such a big delay in receiving that new view? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162941#4162941 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162941

17 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - exchange with WSRP

by cedseat

Hello, Is it possible to send parameters to a WSRP? Or share a session? I try to manage a portal with a context (a number). When I call a WSRP, I would like to transmit this context to the WSRP. I tested in local and with the Navigation.getPortalRuntimeContext().getSession(). I managed to exchange information between local portlets. But the Navigation.getPortalRuntimeContext().getSession() not run with WSRP because the WSRP is executed in another JVM. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162916#4162916 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162916

17 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Security on JBoss] - Re: JBoss Negotiation - SPNEGO

by anil.saldhana＠jboss.com

I would put the PAC and cluster cache on lower priority. From my perspective, the windows SSO and IPA integration (documented) would be the deal clincher for the 1.0 release. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162915#4162915 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162915

17 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Clustering on JBoss (Clusters/JBoss)] - Re: JBPAPP-863 -- FC blocks during slow failure detection

by bstansberry＠jboss.com

Also, please get rid of the | worker.jawa03.retries=2 | worker.jawa03.reply_timeout=8000 | and see what happens. I'm wondering if that is causing a couple of attempts per node, then a failover to the other node, a couple more attempts, and so on. Effect is multiple semi-concurrent requests for the same session leading to semi-deadlocks. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162913#4162913 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162913

17 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Please don't use IDE auto format on commit

by timfox

If anyone has auto format on commit turned on in their IDE, please disable it. It's annoying to have to go and correct a file since it's been munged on commit. (I have had to do this several times). View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162910#4162910 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162910

17 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Profiler] - Memory Usage

by kent.masden＠homeq.com

I am using jboss-profiler 2.0 beta 1 and have memory=true set in the jboss-profiler.properties file but I do not see any information about memory usage in the snap shot files. If someone could let me know how to get that information I would appreciate it. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162909#4162909 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162909

17 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums July 2008