July 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Abstractions again - MDR - sigh!

by alesj

"alesj" wrote : | but now I don't know how to enable this test artifact push on the MDR side. | | | Caused by: Missing: | | ---------- | | 1) org.jboss:jboss-mdr:test-jar:tests:2.0.0-SNAPSHOT Probably this is what I'm looking for: | <plugin> | <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId> | <artifactId>maven-jar-plugin</artifactId> | <executions> | <execution> | <goals> | <goal>test-jar</goal> | </goals> | </execution> | </executions> | </plugin> | ;-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162836#4162836 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162836

17 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Abstractions again - MDR - sigh!

by alesj

"alesj" wrote : "adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : "alesj" wrote : | | | A new project for 3 classes? OK. :-) | | | | btw: how do I pull in MDR's tests? | I've added this: | <dependency> | <groupId>org.jboss</groupId> | <artifactId>jboss-mdr</artifactId> | <version>${version.org.jboss.mdr}</version> | <type>test-jar</type> | <scope>test</scope> | </dependency> | but now I don't know how to enable this test artifact push on the MDR side. | Caused by: Missing: | ---------- | 1) org.jboss:jboss-mdr:test-jar:tests:2.0.0-SNAPSHOT View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162834#4162834 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162834

17 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Abstractions again - MDR - sigh!

by manik.surtani＠jboss.com

Sorry I only just saw this. JBC no longer depends on jboss-javaee. It just needed JTA interfaces from jboss-javaee and now depends on the jta artifact in the javax.transaction group (since 2.2.0.CR1). I believe Brian is updating AS 5 clustering code to depend on 2.2.0.CR6, the target JBC release for AS 5 being 2.2.0.GA. I know circular dependency isn't the only issue detailed above, but as an FYI, that part of it is taken care of if you use a 2.2.0 CR. Cheers Manik View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162833#4162833 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162833

17 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Abstractions again - MDR - sigh!

by alesj

"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : "alesj" wrote : | | A new project for 3 classes? OK. :-) | | btw: how do I pull in MDR's tests? What all do I need to declare, in original MDR and my new MDR-cache? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162826#4162826 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162826

17 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Abstractions again - MDR - sigh!

by adrian＠jboss.org

"alesj" wrote : | A new project for 3 classes? OK. :-) | It's only 3 classes now, but in future there could be much more. e.g. creating a MetaDataLoader that goes in a "Cluster' scope that can load metadata from across the cluster using jboss cache/jgroups. i.e. a sort of farming of default metadata changes View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162825#4162825 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162825

17 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Abstractions again - MDR - sigh!

by alesj

"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | Also in JBossAS it would require JBoss Cache (+ related jars) | to be in the bootstrap classloader otherwise it couldn't load the classes. | | Bootstrap ClassLoader: jboss-mdr.jar | ^ | | Delegation is this way | | | server/.../lib classloader: jboss-cache.jar, jgroups.jar, etc. | | new JBossCacheCacheFactory() => NCDFE JBossCache You mean this: "alesj" wrote : | OK, I know JBossCache has LRU eviction policy, but this would mean dragging whole JBC into bootstrap. | from http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=138470. ;-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162823#4162823 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162823

17 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Abstractions again - MDR - sigh!

by adrian＠jboss.org

"alesj" wrote : "adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : In future, always think carefully before introducing additional | | (non-trivial or non-optional) thirdparty dependencies | | to a project. This should be as big a decision as changing the spi. | Noted. | | But the main problem here is, like you already pointed, is that JBossCache doesn't have proper split - Cache(Factory) being in spi, the impl details in some other part, which we wouldn't pull in, except for tests. | SPI/Impl split has nothing to do with the problem. You'd still get the circular dependency because you've got to pull in the implementation jar at some point, all you've done is fix the compile time problem for the spi. Also in JBossAS it would require JBoss Cache (+ related jars) to be in the bootstrap classloader otherwise it couldn't load the classes. Bootstrap ClassLoader: jboss-mdr.jar ^ | Delegation is this way | server/.../lib classloader: jboss-cache.jar, jgroups.jar, etc. new JBossCacheCacheFactory() => NCDFE JBossCache View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162822#4162822 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162822

17 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Abstractions again - MDR - sigh!

by alesj

"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : In future, always think carefully before introducing additional | (non-trivial or non-optional) thirdparty dependencies | to a project. This should be as big a decision as changing the spi. Noted. But the main problem here is, like you already pointed, is that JBossCache doesn't have proper split - Cache(Factory) being in spi, the impl details in some other part, which we wouldn't pull in, except for tests. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162821#4162821 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162821

17 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Abstractions again - MDR - sigh!

by alesj

"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | If you want to create a seperate project to implement CacheFactory | on top of JBossCache then go ahead. | OK, I'll create a new project: jboss-mdr-cache Can I pull this piece in just for MDR tests? "adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | It's a good job I was awake while trying to rebuild jboss-mdr: | Yup, looks like you had enough sleep over the weekend. :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162820#4162820 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162820

17 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Abstractions again - MDR - sigh!

by adrian＠jboss.org

In future, always think carefully before introducing additional (non-trivial or non-optional) thirdparty dependencies to a project. This should be as big a decision as changing the spi. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4162819#4162819 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4162819

17 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums July 2008