February 2009 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: DeliveryCount & ACKs

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

Few posts ago I said: anonymous wrote : | We can't do that, as we need to distinguish messages sent to the buffer, from messages consumed on the client. | And you said that based on the Spec, it should be ok to update the counter as soon as it was sent to the buffer on the client, Those tests are validating that behaviour. (A message sent to the client, but not consumed). View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4211124#4211124 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4211124

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - process resume

by galanfish

in a parallel structure for example and-split -> and-join scene, more than one child-execution will be created, if something goes wrong in alternative branch with a exception throw out, in the exceptionhandler i persist the process instance, is it possible to resume the process instance to the status before the exception happen, i mean just what it looks like as the moment the exception still haven't happen, i wanted to redo the logic or what programmic should i do to resolve this problem View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4211119#4211119 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4211119

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: [JBMESSAGING-1367] Create JCA resource adapter for JBM 2

by ataylor

anonymous wrote : The session MUST be enlisted in the tx before delivery has occured - not after! Ok, then the current implementation must also be wrong. If thats the case then we need to call: endpoint.beforeDelivery(JBMActivation.ONMESSAGE); but I'm not sure when! View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4211116#4211116 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4211116

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: a method to get admin roles in RoleModule

by sviluppatorefico

ok.... I continue in this manner View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4211110#4211110 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4211110

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: [JBMESSAGING-1367] Create JCA resource adapter for JBM 2

by timfox

The session MUST be enlisted in the tx before delivery has occured - not after! View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4211107#4211107 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4211107

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: DeliveryCount & ACKs

by timfox

The Jms tests should not change. If the behaviour has changed to the client, then you haven't implemented it properly View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4211106#4211106 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4211106

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: [JBMESSAGING-1367] Create JCA resource adapter for JBM 2

by ataylor

Theres also a problem with the XAResource being started twice. both in JBMMessageHandler at: line 409 if (!trans.enlistResource(res)) and line 213 endpoint.beforeDelivery(JBMActivation.ONMESSAGE); I'm guessing the first one doesn't need to happen.. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4211103#4211103 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4211103

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: task and swimlane roles

by kukeltje

I will come up with a more detailed response later, but why not take terminology from http://www.workflowpatterns.com/patterns/resource/resource_modelling.php or maybe from ws-ht? Creating our own terminology is imo not the way to go. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4211096#4211096 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4211096

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: statefull vs stateless delegation classes

by jbarrez

I agree: they should be stateless. And indeed, as a consequence they can be shared by all who needs them. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4211095#4211095 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4211095

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: statefull vs stateless delegation classes

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

"camunda" wrote : But it should be made sure that one action object is only used for one thread at a time, like a pool... why ? if they're stateless, i don't see the point. then all threads can use the same delegation object, no ? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4211094#4211094 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4211094

17 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums February 2009