May 2009 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: JmsConnectionPool: Allowing control over the number of S

by tfennelly

When you saying allow it to be configured centrally in the jbossesb-properties.xml and then override it in the JNDI config? I think that wuld lead to even more confusion because if someone configures it centrally to something very low, it will result in all pools creating loads of connections (unwittingly). View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4231326#4231326 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4231326

16 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: JmsConnectionPool: Allowing control over the number of S

by tfennelly

"Kevin.Conner(a)jboss.com" wrote : "Kevin.Conner(a)jboss.com" wrote : If we went down that route then yes, but wasn't that your question? ;) | On second thoughts it might add more confusion if done this way as the user would need to consider every deployment and whether it was XA/non XA. It might be easier for the user if we had two separate parameters. | | What do you think? | | Kev Not quite sure I follow. Don't they need to be aware of this anyway? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4231325#4231325 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4231325

16 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: JmsConnectionPool: Allowing control over the number of S

by tfennelly

"Kevin.Conner(a)jboss.com" wrote : Yes, which is my justification for going down the JNDI route rather than including it in jbossesb-properties.xml. Wasn't jbossesb-properties.xml your other option? Ah right... sorry... it was my first suggestion and then I went back towards the JNDI approach after having a closer look at that the JmsConnectionPool container. So... I think we're saying that if we stick with the JNDI approach (what I currently have) for "max-sessions-per-connection", then we don't need to separate out the XA and non-XA stuff, right? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4231323#4231323 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4231323

16 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: JmsConnectionPool: Allowing control over the number of S

by Kevin.Conner＠jboss.com

"Kevin.Conner(a)jboss.com" wrote : If we went down that route then yes, but wasn't that your question? ;) On second thoughts it might add more confusion if done this way as the user would need to consider every deployment and whether it was XA/non XA. It might be easier for the user if we had two separate parameters. What do you think? Kev View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4231322#4231322 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4231322

16 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: JmsConnectionPool: Allowing control over the number of S

by Kevin.Conner＠jboss.com

"tfennelly" wrote : Would the different servers not mean different provider URLs and so a different poolKey and so a different pool? Yes, which is my justification for going down the JNDI route rather than including it in jbossesb-properties.xml. Wasn't jbossesb-properties.xml your other option? Kev View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4231321#4231321 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4231321

16 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: JmsConnectionPool: Allowing control over the number of S

by Kevin.Conner＠jboss.com

"tfennelly" wrote : Is this not taken care of by the existence (or not) of "max-sessions-per-connection" in the JNDI config? If we went down that route then yes, but wasn't that your question? ;) Kev View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4231319#4231319 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4231319

16 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: JmsConnectionPool: Allowing control over the number of S

by tfennelly

"Kevin.Conner(a)jboss.com" wrote : The reason I say this is because the value may be different if using different servers (same provider) within the ESB. Would the different servers not mean different provider URLs and so a different poolKey and so a different pool? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4231314#4231314 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4231314

16 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: JmsConnectionPool: Allowing control over the number of S

by tfennelly

"Kevin.Conner(a)jboss.com" wrote : We should definitely try to separate the XA/non-XA configuration, as mentioned earlier. Is this not taken care of by the existence (or not) of "max-sessions-per-connection" in the JNDI config? So, different pools will be created for XA and non-XA configurations and you can control "max-sessions-per-connection" separately for each, no? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4231310#4231310 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4231310

16 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: JmsConnectionPool: Allowing control over the number of S

by Kevin.Conner＠jboss.com

We should definitely try to separate the XA/non-XA configuration, as mentioned earlier. I don't think that the JNDI configuration is the ideal place for this but, given the current architecture, it is probably the best we can do at the moment. The reason I say this is because the value may be different if using different servers (same provider) within the ESB. The down side of this is, as you say, that the user may inadvertently create multiple pools within a deployment when they had intended to share it. Kev View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4231299#4231299 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4231299

16 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss ESB] - Re: JmsConnectionPool: Allowing control over the number of S

by tfennelly

Or maybe the JNDI config (i.e. the "poolKey") is the best place to get max.sessions.per.connection from. Setting different values for max.sessions.per.connection on different JNDI configs (e.g. on a JMS Provider or on the JMSRouter) would result in a different poolKey and hence a different pool. Am I reading this correctly? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4231294#4231294 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4231294

16 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums May 2009