May 2009 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: values in example.identities.sql for JBPM4_ID_USER do no

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

so is your point that 'Administrator Login' is not an intuitive value for GIVENNAME_ ? and that you think that 'Alex' is a better value for it ? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4231151#4231151 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4231151

16 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - values in example.identities.sql for JBPM4_ID_USER do not fi

by mrinneL1

This issue applies to revision 4815 and some earlier revisions. The script example.identities.sql contains lines like INSERT INTO JBPM4_ID_USER VALUES (1,0,'alex','password','Administrator Login',''); but the script jbpm.hsqldb.create.sql creates the JBPM4_ID_USER table as follows create table JBPM4_ID_USER ( | DBID_ bigint generated by default as identity (start with 1), | DBVERSION_ integer not null, | ID_ varchar(255), | PASSWORD_ varchar(255), | GIVENNAME_ varchar(255), | FAMILYNAME_ varchar(255), | BUSINESSEMAIL_ varchar(255), | primary key (DBID_) | ); The value 'Administrator Login' does not fit to the columns GIVENNAME_ and FAMILYNAME_. The script example.identities.sql should be changed to use something like INSERT INTO JBPM4_ID_USER VALUES (1,0,'alex','password','Alex','Admin',''); View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4231138#4231138 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4231138

16 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: EJBTHREE-1800 Current status on performance improvement

by jaikiran

We also have some community inputs about our recently release EJB3 plugin 1.0.7 which had some performance improvements http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4231116#4231105 View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4231118#4231118 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4231118

16 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: EJBTHREE-1800 Current status on performance improvement

by jaikiran

After various fixes in EJB3 projects and other projects, we finally have some good news anonymous wrote : | 3) The profiler snapshot shows hotspots on org.jboss.ejb3.metadata.plugins.loader.BridgedMetadataLocader (.retrieveAnnotation) | A bit of digging around showed that the AnnotationRepositoryToMetadata associated with the Advisor was really performing badly. The issue is exactly what got fixed in JBCL-100. Incidentally the fix for JBCL-100 was integrated in AS branch 5_x yesterday. So here's the good news: My test application (100 beans with 100 methods each and couple of injections in each bean) which used to take 25-30 sec (consistently) for deployment, now takes around 14 sec (consistently) with the JBCL-100 fix. Furthermore on my local setup, i tried out the suggested fix for AOPDependencyBuilder issue http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=155244&start=20#.... This reduces the deployment time by 4 seconds more. So now, the deployment which used to take 25-30 sec completes in 10-11 sec (consistently). Further steps of action: 1) I see around 5-6 sec where AOP stuff is going on. Not sure if this can be reduced further. But i will continue looking into this. 2) The suggested fix for AOPDependencyBuilder, needs changes in AS->ejb3 module as well as the *-beans.xml in EJB3 project. We need to discuss when to do this (depends on whether the changes Ales made have gone into the AS branch) 3) Adrian in this thread http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=155074&start=0#4... mentioned that we could disable registering MC beans as MBeans (which are more useful for debugging). This change might slightly improve the AS startup time and deployment time of MC beans. 4) The more important one - Get some community help to get hold of some "real" app to test these changes. So far, i have been test with my own test application. This has led to identification of various performance issues, but we might still be missing some. So a real app will help. I probably will wait for the AS 5.1.0 GA release, before asking for some community testing and some sample apps. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4231112#4231112 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4231112

16 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Management Features on JBoss] - Re: ManagedObjects for MBeans

by pilhuhn

I don't think this is enough as a context root can live under different vhosts - and tomcat is emitting statistics for each vhost separately -- and users want this information. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4231085#4231085 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4231085

16 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Web Services] - [Urgent]: EJBs and web services in Jboss a/s 4.2.2 GA

by veneetr

Hi all, I have a Application that relies on EJBs for Business Logic I basically use the Jboss A/s server for the same and now there is a need to Expose these methods through a web service so that our web team can make use of the same the issue that i am facing is that currently i have implemented a End point interface that my Bean class implements so that i can expose my bean methods to the web dev team Req: I want to create a seperate Bean which resides in the same JVM as my Application bean and so that i can invoke the businees methods and the new Bean acts like a pluggable component for future end use After reading a lot of articles it's stil not clear to me as in how to achieve inter bean communication as in how can two beans Communicate effectively while being Loosely coupled at the same time If you can suggest anything on the same it would be very helpful -- thanks veneet View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4231078#4231078 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4231078

16 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Management Features on JBoss] - Re: trying to get ManagedComponent removal/deletion working

by ips

To produce the exception, I was going to the Resource Type node in the nav tree (e.g. the Topics node), then clicking the Delete button next to one of the Resources (e.g. Topics). I tried this for DS's, CF's, Topics, and Queues and saw the same exception. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4231068#4231068 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4231068

16 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Management Features on JBoss] - JBAS-6693 - Add deployExploded argument to DeploymentManager

by emuckenhuber

WRT: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAS-6693 We might want to add a notion of DeploymentOptions to the DeploymentManager instead of just a boolean argument like: | DeploymentProgress distribute(String name, URL contentURL, DeploymentOption... options); | I would prefer this, as Ian also once pointed out that things like FailIfExists should also be possible to be specified when deploying an application. Basically i see this more as an optional option, as a Profile or DeploymentRepository might not support all options. One thing i'm not really sure is if using the distribute(String name, URL contentURL, DeploymentOption... options) implies copyContent == true? As e.g. ExplodeDeployment would only be available for copyContent = true. A DeploymentOption would be a simple enumeration like: | public enum DeploymentOption | { | FailIfExists, ExplodeDeployment | } | On the DeploymentRepository side we would need to add a additional parameter to the addDeploymentContent like: | String addDeploymentContent(String name, InputStream contentIS, DeploymentOption... options) | I don't really like this, as the profileservice-spi should not really depend on the API from the DeploymentManager. Although it might be ok for 5.x and we'll review that for AS6 again? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4231058#4231058 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4231058

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Management Features on JBoss] - Re: trying to get ManagedComponent removal/deletion working

by emuckenhuber

"ips" wrote : | Also, I had to comment out the deploymentManager.isRedeploySupported() check, because it was returning false. Shouldn't that be returning true? Or perhaps it is returning false to protect me from the exception above :-) | Yes it should have returned true, fixed that. "ips" wrote : | Unfortunately, the redeploy call results in the following exception: | Hmm this is weird. The testcase i wrote for this works, also using a SNAPSHOT of the admin-console does not show that problem. Maybe you can provide more information how to reproduce that? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4231055#4231055 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4231055

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: DESCRIBE phase - Dependency builders for MC Beans

by wolfc

To me it sounds more like a need for a Rete algorithm. Especially if changing annotations results in changing bindings. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4231035#4231035 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4231035

16 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums May 2009