July 2009 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of Management Features on JBoss] - Re: security domain used for securing remote access to Profi

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

We need something like the deploy/ejb3-interceptors-aop.xml RoleBasedAuthorizationInterceptorFactory which is applied to beans annotated with @SecurityDomain: | | <interceptor name="Basic Authorization" factory="org.jboss.ejb3.security.RoleBasedAuthorizationInterceptorFactory" scope="PER_CLASS"/> | | .. | | <domain name="Stateless Bean" extends="Intercepted Bean" inheritBindings="true"> | <bind pointcut="execution(public * *->*(..))"> | <interceptor-ref name="org.jboss.ejb3.ENCPropagationInterceptor"/> | <interceptor-ref name="org.jboss.ejb3.security.AuthenticationInterceptorFactory"/> | </bind> | <bind pointcut="execution(public * @org.jboss.ejb3.annotation.SecurityDomain->*(..))"> | <interceptor-ref name="Basic Authorization"/> | </bind> | <bind pointcut="execution(public * *->*(..))"> | <interceptor-ref name="org.jboss.ejb3.security.RunAsSecurityInterceptorFactory"/> | </bind> | <bind pointcut="execution(public * @org.jboss.ejb3.annotation.Clustered->*(..))"> | <interceptor-ref name="org.jboss.ejb3.remoting.ReplicantsManagerInterceptorFactory"/> | </bind> | View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4242442#4242442 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4242442

16 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Build System] - Re: AS Trunk : Repeated download attempts for jna artifact

by pgier

I added an exclusion in the AS root pom so that it won't try to download this anymore, since it's not actually used anyway. Thanks for finding this. I didn't notice because that jar was in my local repo and so it never tried to download it. I will bring this up on the codehaus mojo list since you are right, at least IMO, the central repo jars shouldn't require you to go to other repositories. The root of this is a problem in Maven that repositories defined in dependency POMs are automatically added to the list of repositories to download from. So things like this aren't always noticed. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4242441#4242441 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4242441

16 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Management Features on JBoss] - Re: security domain used for securing remote access to Profi

by smarlow＠redhat.com

Which security aspect should we use (org.jboss.security.integration.password.Password?) I assume that we want to use the jmx-console domain and JBossAdmin role that we just switched to. Will the client side be using SecurityClient as mentioned here http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4242234 and documented here http://www.jboss.org/file-access/default/members/jbossejb3/freezone/docs/... View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4242435#4242435 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4242435

16 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Management Features on JBoss] - Re: security domain used for securing remote access to Profi

by charles.crouch＠jboss.com

The above is what I would like to discuss on the Embedded Console call in 55mins. Thanks View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4242428#4242428 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4242428

16 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - current activity of execution

by camunda

Hi. To query the current activity of an execution I have to cast the ProcessInstance to the ExecutionImpl class: | ((org.jbpm.pvm.internal.model.ExecutionImpl)pi).getActivityName(); | because it is not part of the PVM/API. Or did I miss something? Why is that the case, an activity name should be available for every language, hence be part of the API, or not? Cheers Bernd View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4242418#4242418 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4242418

16 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossXB] - Re: JBXB-206: Performance work

by jesper.pedersen

That helped a lot, thanks :) I have attached a new profile of the startup to the issue if you think there is anything else to be gained. But most of the time is now spend in org.jboss.reflect. If the call stack is ok I think you can resolve the issue, but some additional documentation about this would be nice. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4242410#4242410 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4242410

16 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Is it possible to avoid hibernate?

by jorgemoralespou_2

I agree with Camunda that an API should be the way. This way you only have to configure the cfg.xml file with services you want, mode you want, implementatiosn for the service, and client code wouldn't need to change much. If you use ExecutionService, this service should be used for any kind of execution. The difference could be to have o not to have a HistoryService, for example. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4242395#4242395 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4242395

16 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Is it possible to avoid hibernate?

by camunda

Tom wrote : | Our current idea is to use methods on the objects themselves for the memory execution mode, and skip the services api's | Woudn't it be much cleaner design if the APi is used as well? And have a in memory implementation which just keeps references of running instances? But it is not easy to build, I agree... View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4242392#4242392 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4242392

16 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Is it possible to avoid hibernate?

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

implementing the repository service on top of the classpath resources is another option. it's less flexible, but indeed much more achievable. so it is a good path to try out as well. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4242387#4242387 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4242387

16 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Is it possible to avoid hibernate?

by jorgemoralespou_2

What I'm thinking of is, to build my own custom ProcessRepository. This process repository would be held in memory, as I only want latest process definitions to be used. Then I would like to instantiate different ExecutionServices, with different persistent strategies for executions and history (memory, db) to enable asynchronous process executions (persistent mode) and synchronous process execution. (memory execution, and persistent or without history). I'll try to start with the on memory process repository, trying to hold ProcessDefinitions in Memory. And then, I think IÄºl try to configure an ExecutionService, without history. Any thoughts? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4242386#4242386 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4242386

16 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums July 2009