GWT hosted mode
by Michael Neale
GWT hosted mode has served us well, but I think I have reached the limit.
This I think we will move to the mode where you need to fire up an app
server, and then fire upt he hosted mode browser for debugging.
18 years, 7 months
pluggeable evaluators
by Mark Proctor
Edson,
Is it possible to make the parser have pluggeable evaluators? From the
Descr/RuleBuilder side it's not too hard, but it does mean that the
operator can be any ID or String. The idea is the name would first be
looked up from a list of available evaluators, if it doesn't find it
then it looks at the list of methods matching the name with a single
parameter on the left fact.
Mar
18 years, 7 months
Adding parameters to RulesTables
by Terry Laurenzo
I added some logic to the decisiontables module to allow properties
to be specified per RulesTable. This is done by declaring a
RulesTableConfig tag followed by properties that should apply to the
following RulesTable. I used this capability to allow declarations
of code snippets that should be inserted before/after generated
conditions and before/after the consequences on the right hand side.
This allows me to create more complicated rule templates.
For example, the declaration:
----
RuleTableConfig
LhsPreamble ##LHS PREAMBLE
LhsTrailer ##LHS TRAILER
RhsPreamble ##RHS PREAMBLE
RhsTrailer ##RHS TRAILER
----
produces the following DRL output:
----
package Testing_table_configuration;
#generated from Decision Table
#From row number: 14
rule "_14"
when
##LHS PREAMBLE
Abc(column == "123")
##LHS TRAILER
then
##RHS PREAMBLE
def.action;
##RHS TRAILER
end
----
The patch which includes these changes (against 3.0.5 source bundle)
is attached. I also added a test case spreadsheet to src/test/
resources/data which is not included in the patch but is attached to
this email. For some reason I was unable to get the patch to apply
cleanly from the command line but Eclipse took it just fine.
Let me know if this is of interest and is a candidate for commit to
SVN. If so, I can update the patch to apply against the trunk.
Terry Laurenzo
18 years, 7 months
Parameterized type
by fanory
Hello,
I have a method on my business model that return a parameterized type:
public <P extends Profile> P getProfileValidAt(Class<P> profileClass, Calendar
validAt) {
List<P> history = getHistoryProfile(profileClass);
for(P profile: history) {
if (profile.getValidFrom().compareTo(validAt)<=0 &&
profile.getValidTo().compareTo(validAt)>=0) {
return profile;
}
}
return null;
}
I use jbossrule 3.0.3.
I my drl files, i use this method but it doesn't work. I have a compilation
error on the rules. If i change parameterized type to a specific profile class,
it works. Do jbossrule accept parameterized type as return value type ?
Thanks in advance.
18 years, 7 months
design thoughts: package configuration and asset loading API
by Michael Neale
Kris - find attached - its not complete, but it will give you a start - very
simple.
Edson - I don't think the assembly of these file assets into a binary
package should be done in an IDE specific way - as we will want to do the
same from:
a) the repo
b) just an api or a directory?
c) a list of Reader objects, combined with each "asset type"
I am thinking
c) is the most generic - so we have an "assembly" api - of which the current
olde stuff is a simple subset:
eg: PackageAssembler.loadFrom(PackageConfig conf, RuleSource[] inputs)
....loadFrom(RuleSource ...) (for accumulating)
RuleSource is basically a Reader, plus some meta data to tell it if it is a
brl, or function, or rule, or dsl, or decision table, or whatever !
Then to satisfy a and b, and the IDE - we just have different adapters to
produce the RuleSource objects ?
Not sure if this should augment PackageBuilder or not - currently package
builder is kind of lower level, but I guess this could be part of it (but is
this API bloat? )
Basically it would feed the PackageBuilder api, so its really a front end of
sorts.
Thoughts ?
Mostly this package assembler would NOT be called directly by users - but by
tools (eg ant, IDE, repo deployer) that users use, whereas the
PackageBuilder is designed for use as it is now.
Michael.
On 3/7/07, Kris Verlaenen <kris.verlaenen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Sure, seems doable. Could you upload a zip containing a larger
> example maybe? I was thinking about some rule files (one for each
> rule, syntax exactly like current drl?), which implicitly refer to
> stuff that is defined in the package file (imports, globals, anything
> else), functions (also in a separate file I assume), etc.
>
> So something to test the builder with: if I'm able to parse that set
> of files, the builder would be supporting all important features :)
>
> Kris
>
> On 3/6/07, Michael Neale <michael.neale(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > Kris, I updated this JIRA:
> >
> > http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-568
> >
> > Can you take a look, tell me if it makes sense, and if its doable.
> Probably
> > could be split into 2 if you like (one for DroolsBuilder, one for the
> GUI).
> > This is critical for BRMS integration, BUT, it is useful even without a
> BRMS
> > (eg this GUI coudl provide a hook to fire of the ant task to compile the
> > rules into a deployable binary package).
> >
>
18 years, 7 months
TUTORIAL
by Rich Halsey
Mark,
I'm going to give some serious thought to doing the tutorial for JBoss Rules (as you suggested). I cannot promise anything definite at this time, but I will definitely look into it.
Rich Halsey
"NON ILLEGITAMATES CARBORUNDUM"
....God grant me...
The senility to forget the people I never liked
The good fortune to run into the ones that I do
And the eyesight to tell the difference."
18 years, 8 months
