Re: [rules-dev] Decision Tables + Templates: Consistency please!

On 01/08/2014, Michael Anstis <michael.anstis(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > I propose the following: > > - For a Pattern, with no constraints we exclude the pattern (this is > current XLS behaviour). > > e.g. Person( name == $name, age == $age ). If we don't provide values for > $name and $age we don't include the Person pattern. If a user wants to > include the Pattern they'd need to add a constraint "this != null". > > If we include the pattern when there are no constraints then it is more > difficult to provide a work-around to exclude the pattern if this is what > some users need (and since it's the existing behaviour; less likely to be > an issue for the majority of XLS users). > > > - Support escaping String literals with quotes; so a user would enter "" > or " ". This make it obvious that the cell contains a non-null value. > The > surrounding quotation marks would be stripped before being used in the > DRL. If the first character is not the quote character (0x22), assume that the value in the cell is the actual value of a String. The result to be used in DRL code will be quoted, and all characters will be escaped as required according to Java rules. If the first character is a quote character (0x22), assume that the value in the cell is a complete String literal, according to Java rules. It will be used "as is" in DRL code. my 2¢ Wolfgang > > > WDYT? Should I put this out to the community for opinions too? > > With kind regards, > > Mike > _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev