Re: [rules-dev] Re : Drools 4.0.x branch has still some issues with serialization
Good to know. Thanks for the feedback.
Drools has 2 configurations for what you want:
1. If you want to completely deny the "existence" of 2 or more equals()
objects in the working memory, change the assert behavior to EQUALITY based.
The default behavior is IDENTITY based:
drools.assertBehaviour = <identity|equality>
or
RuleBaseConfiguration.setAssertBehavior()
2. If you want to allow existence of equals() objects in the working memory,
but want each fact matching at most one pattern in your rule, set
removeIdentities to true:
drools.removeIdentities = <true|false>
or
RuleBaseConfiguration.setRemoveIdentities()
[]s
Edson
2008/3/14, siddhartha banik <siddhartha.banik(a)gmail.com>:
Hi Drools Team,
I have checked out *Drools 4.0.x branch* & found that all my test
scenarios with *"Dynamic Rules"* are now *working fine* *:-)*.
Thanks a lot for fixing the issues so promptly. I appreciate it !!!
Now, we will definitely use Drools in our application.
I have a *Good To have* feature request for Drools: "Include check for
duplicate objects being asserted into Working Memory & don't generate any
activation for such objects or silently don't assert them at all in WM." I
tested this scenario with *JESS*, they are already doing that. This will
save Drools user from doing duplicate check, which is bit costly now.
Or can you please suggest me any simple way, by which still I can achieve
this in Drools ?
Thanks & Happy Drooling
Siddhartha
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
--
Edson Tirelli
JBoss Drools Core Development
Office: +55 11 3529-6000
Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646
JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 2.9 KB)