Re: [rules-dev] Drools ReteOO versus Rete

James, I believe this was related to Drools 2. What exactly is your problem? []s Edson 2009/8/14 James Owen <jco2009(a)att.net <mailto:jco2009@att.net>> Greetings: Just wondering if this link still applies. If so, I think I may have found an answer to one of my benchmark problems. http://docs.codehaus.org/display/DROOLS/Rete+Vs+Reteoo SDG James Owen Founder October Rules Fest Senior Consultant / Architect KBSC http://www.kbsc.com http://www.OctoberRulesFest.org Twitter: OctRulesFest Blogs: http://JavaRules.blogspot.com [Rulebased Systems Blog] http://ORF2009.blogspot.com [October Rules Fest Blog] http://exscg.blogspot.com/ [Expert Systems Consulting Group Blog] /"If I have seen a little further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants."/ *Sir Isaac Newton in a letter to Robert Hooke, 5 Feb 1676* * * *Come to October Rules Fest and stand on the shoulders of the Giants of the industry; if only for a week.* On Aug 13, 2009, at 8:21 AM, mrhoden(a)franklinamerican.com <mailto:mrhoden@franklinamerican.com> wrote: > Depending on your number of rules and facts, that amount of memory > will likely be a concern. If I had memory requirements like that I > would honestly look a clips. > > -Michael > > On Aug 13, 2009, at 2:19 AM, Thomas Frenken > <Thomas.Frenken(a)offis.de <mailto:Thomas.Frenken@offis.de>> > wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I am interested in running Drools 5 (and especially Drools Fusion) >> on a >>>> somehow<< resource-constrained device for which only a J2SE >>>> 1.4 VM >>>> ist >> available. >> >> Since Drools meanwhile requires J2SE 1.5 I thought about >> backporting >> it. >> But before I invest so much effort, I got two questions: >> >> 1) I have downloaded the sourcecode. At a first glance the only >> reason for >> requiering J2SE 1.5 is the extensive use of generics. In case I >> would >> remove all generics from the code, would it be possible to compile >> drools >> for a J2SE 1.4 VM runtime in general or are there other more hidden >> reasons for requiering J2SE 1.5? >> 2) I already meantioned I am planning to run drools on a >> >>somehow<< >> resourcen-constrained device. I explicitly used the term >>somehow<< >> because I am talking of a device with a 400 Mhz CPU and 256 MB RAM >> (some >> people might laugh about calling this resource-constrained). How >> about >> resource-consumption of drools? Has anyone run drools on a >> device with >> similar resources? >> >> Thanks in advance! >> >> Best Regards >> Thomas Frenken >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-dev mailing list >> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev -- Edson Tirelli JBoss Drools Core Development JBoss by Red Hat @ www.jboss.com <http://www.jboss.com> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev