Re: [rules-dev] Missing Artifact: JPAKnowledgeProviderLocalClient

@Bauna, Good news! For now the implementation/integration/configuration that I went with is pretty simple, where all the client needs to do is just provide the "flows"/"rules" (as a list into a bean), and everything else is taken care of by the framework. But I'll definitely check it out. I am currently using RESOURCE_LOCAL with Spring's JPA TM (via Hibernate provider), but need to do additional testing to ensure that Spring communicates any transaction failures back to Drools... Thanks, /Anatoly -- View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Missing-Artifact-JPAK... Sent from the Drools - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.