If your release cycles are this short does that mean you can now sync
version numbers with jBPM?
I would, but Kris has decided next time he always wants
jBPM to be one
version ahead of Drools - so people think it's better.
Mark
Regards
Doug
Douglas Palmer
dpalmer(a)redhat.com
JBoss, by Red Hat
Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 03798903
Directors: Michael Cunningham (USA), Brendan Lane (Ireland), Matt Parson
(USA), Charlie Peters (USA)
On 28 Jun 2011, at 11:19, Geoffrey De Smet wrote:
> Sounds good :) This is a drastic shorter release lifecycle, but I think
> it can be very good for us.
>
> So when shall we aim for the 5.3.0.Beta1?
>
> Here's my original proposed schedule, but I presume we want to shorten than?
>> - For the next 4 weeks, until 22-JUL, we focus on big, risky features.
>> - The 2 weeks after that, until 5-AUG, we focus on bugfixing and avoid risky
changes.
>> On 5-AUG, I release 5.3.0.Beta1 directly from master.
> Op 27-06-11 18:34, Mark Proctor schreef:
>> We will look to do a 5.3 final for early august.
>>
>> Mark
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
> --
> With kind regards,
> Geoffrey De Smet
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev