On 19/08/2011 16:45, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
I'll not create any JIRAs for problems that come and go with the
presence and absence of dialect "mvel".
After one of those, Mark has urged me to create another JIRA for MVEL,
and this I just won't do. For me, as a /Drools /user, this project
/Drools /has adopted MVEL as a vehicle for primary expression and
statement evaluation; since 5.2.0 it seems that I don't have a choice
for some parts of the Drools language. For me, this means that the
full responsibility now rests with the Drools team - I cannot simply
work around by sticking with 'dialect "java"'.
Sorry if this sounds harsh and egocentric, but what I've heard about
MVEL maintainer's non-eagerness for fixing bugs hasn't inspired me to
do otherwise. (Since this is hearsay, I should add the politically
correct statement: "innocent until proven otherwise".)
Mike just
won't explore bugs, without unit tests. Once a unit test is in
place he's responsive in fixing it. Which is fair enough.
Mark
Regards
Wolfgang
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev