Re: [rules-dev] Moving drools-factconstraints
by Esteban Aliverti
And what about factconstraint? It should be possible to move it to
drools-verifier?
Best regards,
El feb 7, 2011 5:53 a.m., "Toni Rikkola" <toni.rikkola(a)gmail.com> escribió:
It should be possible to keep drools-verifier in the drools repo. Doing some
changes to support this right now.
Toni
On Feb 6, 2011, at 11:17 AM, Geoffrey De Smet wrote:
> After the split-up drools-verifier is suppo...
13 years, 2 months
Error when adding custom evaluator to Guvnor
by Willem Jan
I'm running a JBoss AS 4.2.3 instance to deploy Drools Guvnor as well as a
service (MyApp) which interacts with it (downloads the compiled packages
from Guvnor, and fires the rules based on requests sent to it). In this
service, I've defined a custom evaluator definition
"InRangeOfEvaluatorDefinition". This evaluator works as expected when firing
rules loaded from the file system. However, when compiling a package in
Guvnor which uses the evaluator, the following exception is thrown:
java.lang.ClassCastException: com.my.app.InRangeOfEvaluatorDefinition cannot
be cast to org.drools.base.evaluators.EvaluatorDefinition
11:15:25,834 ERROR [STDERR] Caused by: java.lang.ClassCastException:
com.my.app.InRangeOfEvaluatorDefinition cannot be cast to
org.drools.base.evaluators.EvaluatorDefinition
11:15:25,835 ERROR [STDERR] at
org.drools.base.evaluators.EvaluatorRegistry.addEvaluatorDefinition(EvaluatorRegistry.java:128)
I've added the definition to
drools-guvnor.war/META-INF/drools.packagebuilder.conf:
drools.evaluator.inrangeof = com.my.app.InRangeOfEvaluatorDefinition
My first guess would be that MyApp and Guvnor use different versions of
org.drools.base, but both seem to use Drools 5.1.1 (same JAR sizes).
Any ideas would be appreciated. Thanks in advance!
--
View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Error-when-adding-cus...
Sent from the Drools - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
13 years, 2 months
Re: [rules-dev] Clean up your topic branches on the github reference repository
by Leonardo Gomes
I think I will wait then.
After that, I should merge my branch with master on my new fork and then
create a pull request, right?
What will happen with unfinished work on our forks after the split? There
will be a way to merge it to the new fork (from the split)?
Thanks,
Leonardo.
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Geoffrey De Smet
<ge0ffrey.spam(a)gmail.com>wrote:
> Leonardo,
>
> Yea, I believe Estaban's right, but there's bigger problem...
>
> I was hoping that all those topic branches were already merged into master
> and none had to survive, but yours does.
> As soon as 5.2.0.M1 is out, we'll announce a date to split-up the
> droolsjbpm repository into smaller repositories (drools, jbpm, guvnor,
> planner, eclipse, ...),
> so that will basically impact all forks... as they will basically have to
> be re-forked.
> I know this is very annoying if you forked the droolsjbpm repo,
> but the split-up needs to be done as it will make life a lot better for us
> (see seam 3 and hibernate 4 repos).
>
> So, for these topic branches that need to survive:
> I am ok to *leave those surviving topic branches on the blessed repo until
> after the split-up*,
> which should make it easier to move them into your fork then.
> But please delete your topic branches that have been merged into master
> long ago.
>
> Op 31-01-11 15:13, Esteban Aliverti schreef:
>
> I think when you create a fork you are also "copying" all the branches. So
> you will have all your code there. Then you should do a merge between your
> brach (in your fork) and the master (also in your fork). Then you could
> perform a pull request.
> I'm not sure if this is correct. Let us wait for someone with more
> experience in git to correct me.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
>
> Esteban Aliverti
> - Developer @ http://www.plugtree.com
> - Blog @ http://ilesteban.wordpress.com
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Leonardo Gomes <
> leonardo.f.gomes(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Geoffrey,
>>
>> Let me check if I understood the procedure:
>>
>> 1) You want us to fork: https://github.com/droolsjbpm/droolsjbpm
>>
>> 2) Then apply the changes that are in our forked branch (in my case,
>> https://github.com/leogomes/droolsjbpm/tree/lr_unlinking_20101116)
>> to our forked main (https://github.com/leogomes/droolsjbpm)
>>
>> 3) Remove the branch
>>
>> 4) And, when we are done we the work on our fork, create a pull request to
>> deliver the changes to the master.
>>
>> That's it? If so, is there an easy way to do 2, other than generating a
>> patch and applying it manually?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Leonardo.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Leonardo Gomes <
>> leonardo.f.gomes(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm planning to get rid of "lr_unlinking_20101116" over the weekend.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Leonardo.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Esteban Aliverti <
>>> esteban.aliverti(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> trunk_20100722_esteban_diega branch and tag are no longer among us :(
>>>> I have also deleted guvnor_expressionEditor3_baunax_esteban_20100202 tag
>>>>
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>
>>>> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
>>>>
>>>> Esteban Aliverti
>>>> - Developer @ http://www.plugtree.com
>>>> - Blog @ http://ilesteban.wordpress.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Geoffrey De Smet <
>>>> ge0ffrey.spam(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>>
>>>>> In the github reference repository
>>>>> https://github.com/droolsjbpm/droolsjbpm
>>>>> we have /release branches/, such as 4.0.x, 5,0.x, 5.1.x, 5.2.0.M1.x,
>>>>> ...
>>>>> which is fine,
>>>>> but also topic branches which clutter our reference repository.
>>>>>
>>>>> Following the conventions of other projects, we'd like to move all
>>>>> topic
>>>>> branches out of the github reference repository, by:
>>>>>
>>>>> * 1) Removing the topic branch if it has been merged into master
>>>>> long ago and has become irrelevant
>>>>> * 2) Keep the topic branch local (if it's short-lived) until it's
>>>>> merged into master
>>>>> * 3) Forking the reference repository on github and push your topic
>>>>> branches there, until it's merged into master
>>>>> o For example, edson's fork:
>>>>> https://github.com/etirelli/droolsjbpm
>>>>>
>>>>> Here's a list of the topic branches that we want to get rid of.
>>>>> If one of them is yours, please read on.
>>>>>
>>>>> * Branch_4_0_2_SOA_4_2
>>>>> * DRLv6
>>>>> * DROOLS_4_0_2_SOA_4_2_GA
>>>>> * DroolsChance
>>>>> * K200
>>>>> * effective_dated
>>>>> * guvnor-pre-guided-changes-june-09
>>>>> * kstam_guvnor_modeshape
>>>>> * lr_unlinking_20101116
>>>>> * persistence_refactor
>>>>> * rete_using_static_methods_aug2009trunk_20100722_esteban_diega
>>>>>
>>>>> If 1) applies and it has been merged into master long ago and has
>>>>> become
>>>>> irrelevant, then just remove it with this command:
>>>>> $ git push origin :<branchname>
>>>>> For example:
>>>>> $ git push origin :kstam_guvnor_modeshape
>>>>>
>>>>> If 2) or 3) applies, its a bit more difficult, but I'll make a blog in
>>>>> a
>>>>> few weeks on how to fork and do social coding.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> With kind regards,
>>>>> Geoffrey De Smet
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> rules-dev mailing list
>>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> rules-dev mailing list
>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing listrules-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
> --
> With kind regards,
> Geoffrey De Smet
>
>
13 years, 2 months
Re: [rules-dev] Convert .brl to .drl
by kamalhas
any one help me to convert the .brl to .drl i have used the code given in
this forum but i got some error in conversion like this
com.thoughtworks.xstream.converters.ConversionException: metadataList :
metadataList : metadataList : metadataList
---- Debugging information ----
message : metadataList : metadataList
cause-exception :
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.CannotResolveClassException
cause-message : metadataList : metadataList
class : org.drools.brms.client.modeldriven.brl.RuleModel
required-type : org.drools.brms.client.modeldriven.brl.RuleModel
path : /rule/metadataList
-------------------------------
at
com.thoughtworks.xstream.core.TreeUnmarshaller.convert(TreeUnmarshaller.java:89)
at
com.thoughtworks.xstream.core.AbstractReferenceUnmarshaller.convert(AbstractReferenceUnmarshaller.java:63)
at
com.thoughtworks.xstream.core.TreeUnmarshaller.convertAnother(TreeUnmarshaller.java:76)
at
com.thoughtworks.xstream.core.TreeUnmarshaller.convertAnother(TreeUnmarshaller.java:60)
at
com.thoughtworks.xstream.core.TreeUnmarshaller.start(TreeUnmarshaller.java:137)
at
com.thoughtworks.xstream.core.AbstractTreeMarshallingStrategy.unmarshal(AbstractTreeMarshallingStrategy.java:33)
at com.thoughtworks.xstream.XStream.unmarshal(XStream.java:923)
at com.thoughtworks.xstream.XStream.unmarshal(XStream.java:909)
at com.thoughtworks.xstream.XStream.fromXML(XStream.java:853)
at com.thoughtworks.xstream.XStream.fromXML(XStream.java:845)
at
org.drools.brms.server.util.BRXMLPersistence.unmarshal(BRXMLPersistence.java:91)
at com.sample.DroolsTest.main(DroolsTest.java:33)
Caused by: com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.CannotResolveClassException:
metadataList : metadataList
at
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.DefaultMapper.realClass(DefaultMapper.java:68)
at
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.MapperWrapper.realClass(MapperWrapper.java:38)
at
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.DynamicProxyMapper.realClass(DynamicProxyMapper.java:71)
at
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.MapperWrapper.realClass(MapperWrapper.java:38)
at
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.PackageAliasingMapper.realClass(PackageAliasingMapper.java:88)
at
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.MapperWrapper.realClass(MapperWrapper.java:38)
at
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.ClassAliasingMapper.realClass(ClassAliasingMapper.java:86)
at
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.MapperWrapper.realClass(MapperWrapper.java:38)
at
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.MapperWrapper.realClass(MapperWrapper.java:38)
at
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.MapperWrapper.realClass(MapperWrapper.java:38)
at
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.MapperWrapper.realClass(MapperWrapper.java:38)
at
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.MapperWrapper.realClass(MapperWrapper.java:38)
at
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.MapperWrapper.realClass(MapperWrapper.java:38)
at
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.ArrayMapper.realClass(ArrayMapper.java:96)
at
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.MapperWrapper.realClass(MapperWrapper.java:38)
at
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.MapperWrapper.realClass(MapperWrapper.java:38)
at
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.MapperWrapper.realClass(MapperWrapper.java:38)
at
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.MapperWrapper.realClass(MapperWrapper.java:38)
at
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.MapperWrapper.realClass(MapperWrapper.java:38)
at
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.MapperWrapper.realClass(MapperWrapper.java:38)
at
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.MapperWrapper.realClass(MapperWrapper.java:38)
at
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.CachingMapper.realClass(CachingMapper.java:52)
at
com.thoughtworks.xstream.converters.reflection.AbstractReflectionConverter.determineType(AbstractReflectionConverter.java:347)
at
com.thoughtworks.xstream.converters.reflection.AbstractReflectionConverter.doUnmarshal(AbstractReflectionConverter.java:208)
at
com.thoughtworks.xstream.converters.reflection.AbstractReflectionConverter.unmarshal(AbstractReflectionConverter.java:162)
at
com.thoughtworks.xstream.core.TreeUnmarshaller.convert(TreeUnmarshaller.java:82)
... 11 more
--
View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Convert-brl-to-drl-tp...
Sent from the Drools - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
13 years, 2 months
