Re: [rules-dev] Issues with fixing duplicate rule name declarations in separate resource files.

On 09/07/2011 23:59, Mikael Lönneberg wrote: > Hi, > > In trying to fix JBRULES-2730 and JBRULES-3063, I noticed that fixing > this issue will actually break MiscTest#testRuleReplacement. > So should this test case be rewritten to not allow rule replacement, > or are there circumstances where rule replacements are allowed and if > that is the case what are those circumstances? Rule replacement is allowed and an important part of a dynamic rule engine. I believe what we do is disallow it from the same resource (should double check that) i.e. a drl that repeats the rule twice is an error. If you load a later resource it will overwrite the previous.

> > ConsequenceOffsetTest.testConsequenceOffset also fails due to loading > two resource files with the same package and rule name defined in the > different files. > Sounds like a bug, can you update some stronger tests and fix? Mark > > Kind regards > > Mikael Lonneberg - gwendo > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev