Re: [rules-dev] drools-spring and drools-guice
Mark Proctor wrote:
Ultimiately the integration should be quite lightweight - mostly about
creating rulebases and working memory and probably the scoping and
caching of these. I guess you could also have some life cycle management
about objects themselves and auto assertion/retraction to named working
memories.
Sorry for the late entry Mark. If this the desired scope, the work I did for
2.0 is probably highly relevant. It had factory beans for creating WM and
such. Is that code checked into the jboss version of the repository?
-barry
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/drools-spring-and-drools-guice-tp14795239p16810831....
Sent from the drools - dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.