Re: [rules-dev] drools-core/repository in subversion

Geoffrey De Smet wrote: > Maybe "target" isn't the right spot, as it gets cleaned with a "mvn > clean" and you might not want that. > Nevertheless it should be ignored for svn. I'd rather have the cause and not the symptom fixed: > > But instead of just adding repository to svn:ignore, I 'd recommend > putting the repository dir under the dir "local". > "local" is a dir, which is always part of svn:ignore, and I use it to > store many local data that shouldn't be cleaned automatically. > For example: Good ideal, I'll leave that to mic to decide what he wants. > > local/benchmark_machine: > benchmark_my_linux_machine > benchmark_my_windows_machine.exe > benchmarkinput.ttp > output.txt > > local/data: > itc2007 > nqueens > travelingtournament > > local/data/itc2007: > examination > > local/data/itc2007/examination: > examinationSolverBenchmarkResult.xml > solved > > local/data/itc2007/examination/solved: > exam_comp_set1_score-2.008.515_time47.969.xml > exam_comp_set2_score-1.000.617_time77.125.xml > exam_comp_set3_score-20.013.838_time101.750.xml > exam_comp_set4_score-16.025.911_time4.219.xml > exam_comp_set5_score-1.006.041_time12.406.xml > exam_comp_set6_score-7.030.580_time4.438.xml > exam_comp_set7_score-1.005.456_time96.953.xml > exam_comp_set8_score-2.009.661_time42.125.xml > > With kind regards, > Geoffrey De Smet > > > Mark Proctor wrote: >> Geoffrey De Smet wrote: >>> Someone checked in drools-core/repository on the trunk, >>> which is a simple mistake to make, because: >>> - it's not ignored (I) >>> - it's not suppose to be added (A) >>> So svn doesn't know what to do with it (?) and ask every time. >>> >>> I don't understand why these maps need to be created in the first >>> place: >>> drools-core/repository >>> drools-solver/repository >>> drools-solver/drools-solver-core/repository >>> >>> It's a BRMS thing, but I am pretty sure drools solver doesn't need >>> that map :) Can't it be moved under target so it doesn't bother us >>> anymore? >> They don't and its a mistake, I've requested many times that the >> build be fixed for this. >>> >>> Thanks :) >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-dev mailing list >> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >> > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev