Greg Barton wrote:
--- On Wed, 2/18/09, Geoffrey De Smet <ge0ffrey.spam(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> The current workarounds [to undo-then] are clunky:
> - Writing an negative (opposite) rule isn't efficient:
> it means declaring the rule twice effectively. Also the
> negative rule is usually using lots of or's and
> not's which isn't fast.
>
This would be made easier by...drum roll please...the else clause! :)
yes we want OPSJ style else statements, edson has an idea on how to do
that, just a matter of time :(
Now, if there was the else clause plus undo-then/closures you could
probably write an entire complex ruleset in one rule. Might as well just use perl, then.
:P
heh, that's true you would have potentially encapsulated 4 possible
executions in a single rule.
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev