Re: [rules-dev] [rules-users] copyright violation issue on Drools

Just saying no can be done in a second. I've been waiting for over two months and he's supposed to explain why. Thanks for feeding me again! Yusuke On Sep 2, 2010, at 12:03 AM, Mark Proctor wrote: > On 01/09/2010 15:38, Yusuke Yamamoto wrote: >> Actually I contacted Red Hat's QA engineers first. >> And they told me that legal dept. - Richard Fontana - will get back to me. >> But so far I got no meaningful response. And it's been over two months. > The response was meaningful, it just wasn't the response you wanted. He > said no, and that the matter is closed. > > Mark >> On Sep 1, 2010, at 11:29 PM, Eric Schabell wrote: >> >>> I think someone needs to look a bit closer at this story, as you have the PROJECT Drools which is not the same as the PRODUCTS produced and supported by Red Hat. >>> >>> Red Hat does not 'own' the Drools project, it just sponsors the project a lot and pays some of the developers to do what they do. >>> >>> I am not surprised that Red Hat legal dept does not respond, they have nothing to respond to. >>> >>> Regards, erics >>> >>> ----- "Yusuke Yamamoto"<yamamoyu(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> I understand you, but Red Hat legal dept. doesn't responding and there's no other place to talk this matter. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> rules-dev mailing list >>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-dev mailing list >> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev