Thank you!
-W
On 21 August 2011 21:00, Mario Fusco <mario.fusco(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 12:36 AM, Mark Proctor
<mproctor(a)codehaus.org>wrote:
> On 19/08/2011 20:44, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
>
> On 19 August 2011 18:07, Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> Mike just won't explore bugs, without unit tests. Once a unit test is
>> in place he's responsive in fixing it. Which is fair enough.
>>
>
> The point is that for me (and presumably most other Drools users) the step
> from a DRL construct towards an MVEL unit test isn't a simple one.
> -W
>
> We can't write all the software ourselves, we have to re-use OSS libraries
> and be a part of those communities, and the baggage that comes with them.
>
> We've hired Mario full time, who is now responsible for this area. So that
> should atleast help in some aspect, as we can be more pro-active in
> ownership of MVEL issues.
>
> Mark
>
The problem seems caused by MVEL not properly managing methods accepting a
varargs.
I created a failing test and sent a pull request including it:
https://github.com/mvel/mvel/pull/11
As Mark wrote, in future I will try to help Mike in testing and possibly
fixing those MVEL issues.
Mario
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev