Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor split-up

I will be starting the split tomorrow. On 2 April 2013 11:23, Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org&gt; wrote: studio might be a problem, like suite and platform, it might overlap with something they prefer in the RHT product names. We could have "workbench" instead of "work". That would still be under IWE. Integrated Workbench Environment. Or we could drop the Enviornement and have IWB - Integrated WorkBench. Mostly I want to make sure we don't chose something that skewer people's thinking that it's only suitable for a specific use case, hence my search for a more generic term. Also that we find a suitably short acronym. This framework can form the basis of a variety of use cases. IDE - Integrated Development Environment IWE - Integrated WorkBench Environment. IWB - Integrated WorkBench AWD - Advanced WorkBench Mark On 2 Apr 2013, at 10:05, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > On 02/04/2013, Michael Anstis <michael.anstis(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >> I'm easy with "W" instead of "D". How about "Integrated Work Studio" >> instead of "Environment"? >> > > Seems to me that people have forgotten about the good old work bench. > Too nutsy-and-boltsy for the brighter future? > > -W > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev