I reviewed the patch, it would be nice if there was a unit test too for this - to ensure
we catch any future regressions.
Mark
On 23 Sep 2012, at 07:53, Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org> wrote:
If you have a patch for review, please submit it as a pull request at
github. Details of how to this are here:
http://docs.jboss.org/drools/release/5.4.0.Final/droolsjbpm-introduction-...
Mark
On 22 Sep 2012, at 12:11, Chris Rankin <rankincj(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I stumbled across an issue in Drools 5.1.1 that is still present in
> Drools 5.4.0-Final, and which I raised (with a patch) as JBRULES-3630.
> This issue is a blocker for what I need to do with Drools - the
> correctness (or not) of the patch will determine whether what I am
> trying to do is viable. Can anyone comment on this, please? Is this
> really a bug in Drools, or have I completely misunderstood the
> documentation instead?
>
> Thanks,
> Chris
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev