query can somewhat help for re-usable elements, as per "Add CE
templates". You can wrap elements in a query and use that inside a
rule, remember our queries are reactive if you leave off the ?.
Mark
On 27/03/2012 10:02, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
I've collected a few things I've been moaning about... They
are
intended to make DRL programming more convenient, given the current
set of the Engine's capabilities, i.e., enhance Drools' usability!
AFAIK, none of these proposals would break backward compatibility.
Cheers
Wolfgang
On 27/03/2012, Mark Proctor<mproctor(a)codehaus.org> wrote:
> I've put up a wiki page to collect thoughts on ideas that would involve
> breaking backwards compatability in Drools. It's aimed to produce ideas
> for Drools 6.0.
>
> No suggestion is too silly, think of it as a brainstorming area for
> alternative syntaxes and behaviours to what we have now, so knock
> yourself out.
>
https://community.jboss.org/wiki/BreakingChangesSuggestions
>
> Mark
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev