reflect our discussions.
I will need 2 new droolsjbpm repositories: drools-iwb and kie-iwb-shared;
Geoffrey, Mark can you please create these (if you are in agreement)?
I have notionally included jBPM on the diagram to illustrate how
consistency across KIE could be achieved. I am not restructuring their
modules.
With kind regards,
Mike
On 10 April 2013 20:22, Michael Anstis <michael.anstis(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I was going to use the following Group/Artifact IDs:
org.drools:drools-iwb for Drools editors
org.kie:guvnor for generic Guvnor.
org.kie:kie-iwb-shared for the module for things that both Drools and jBPM
editors need.
I'd plan on kie-ide becoming kie-iwb.
On 10 Apr 2013 19:19, "Mark Proctor" <mproctor(a)codehaus.org> wrote:
> Did we decided on an extension, instead of IDE?
>
> Mark
> On 10 Apr 2013, at 17:11, Michael Anstis <michael.anstis(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> I will be starting the split tomorrow.
>
>
>
> On 2 April 2013 11:23, Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org> wrote:
>
>> studio might be a problem, like suite and platform, it might overlap
>> with something they prefer in the RHT product names.
>>
>> We could have "workbench" instead of "work". That would still
be under
>> IWE. Integrated Workbench Environment. Or we could drop the Enviornement
>> and have IWB - Integrated WorkBench.
>>
>> Mostly I want to make sure we don't chose something that skewer people's
>> thinking that it's only suitable for a specific use case, hence my search
>> for a more generic term. Also that we find a suitably short acronym. This
>> framework can form the basis of a variety of use cases.
>>
>> IDE - Integrated Development Environment
>> IWE - Integrated WorkBench Environment.
>> IWB - Integrated WorkBench
>> AWD - Advanced WorkBench
>>
>> Mark
>>
>> On 2 Apr 2013, at 10:05, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > On 02/04/2013, Michael Anstis <michael.anstis(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> I'm easy with "W" instead of "D". How about
"Integrated Work Studio"
>> >> instead of "Environment"?
>> >>
>> >
>> > Seems to me that people have forgotten about the good old work bench.
>> > Too nutsy-and-boltsy for the brighter future?
>> >
>> > -W
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > rules-dev mailing list
>> > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>