Re: [rules-dev] backward chaining

Mostly out of curiosity: I have implemented a few things using full-blown backward chaining and I know that these things could have been implemented just as well using forward chaining. Therefore: Why does your project "need" bw chaining?

Of course, if you have a good algorithm based on that, it may be easier to stay with it. -W On 1 November 2010 10:15, Christine Karman <mylists(a)christine.nl <mailto:mylists@christine.nl>> wrote: On 10/29/2010 04:32 PM, Mark Proctor wrote: > We have a prototype of BC that works, but won't be ready until Q1 next > year. Is that in the svn? Is it a separate project in svn, or is it part of the trunk? dagdag Christine > Mark >> dagdag >> Christine > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > -- dagdag is just a two-character rotation of byebye. _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev