Re: [rules-dev] Conway example - update to use ruleflow
Hi Michael.
I think Mark was working on a "stateful" conways example (the old was
stateless) - I wasn't sure if he got to using ruleflow (just check first).
Ruleflow is probably very useful to most people who would have used
agenda-groups - agenda-groups are a stack, which is not intuitive to most
people, but ruleflows are more imperative, so examples showing that are
appreciated. I would almost go as far as to say that *most* of the time when
you want control, you want ruleflow (you will know if you want agenda).
Correct me if I am wrong, ruleflow is new to me !
Michael.
On 5/16/07, Anstis, Michael (M.) <manstis1(a)ford.com> wrote:
Just to let you know I am updating the example to use ruleflow (it looks
like one or more rules are wrong too as the "glider" doesn't glide, so
I'll
have a look at these also).
Doesn't look particularly taxing so should have it done very soon -
provided the wife doesn't complain that she's not seeing much of me in the
evenings ;-)
With kind regards,
Mike
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 1.9 KB)