Re: [rules-dev] Functional programming in Drools: Brackets and Commas
On 20/10/2011 12:43, Toni Rikkola wrote:
Yes parentheses.
And I don't know the answer to the next question, just asking because
I have seen it work in other languages :-) Not a must have, in other
cases using parentheses is cleaner.
It does look nice, however languages that allow
this tend to be more
limited in scope. I was thinking about this myself the other day -
optional parenthesis and optional comma separation. We'll look into it
as a secondary consideration, it may become possible for some limited
use cases....
Mark
Toni
On Oct 20, 2011, at 2:25 PM, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
>
>
> On 20 October 2011 13:15, Toni Rikkola <toni.rikkola(a)gmail.com
> <mailto:toni.rikkola@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> I'm just asking if we can drop the brackets and maybe even the
> commas to get a cleaner look.
>
>
> Do you mean parentheses, i.e. ()?
>
> How will a parser be able to determine the end of a parameterlist if
> there is one call inside the other?
>
> -W
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 3.4 KB)