On 19/08/2011 17:07, Mark Proctor wrote:
On 19/08/2011 16:45, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
> I'll not create any JIRAs for problems that come and go with the
> presence and absence of dialect "mvel".
>
> After one of those, Mark has urged me to create another JIRA for
> MVEL, and this I just won't do. For me, as a /Drools /user, this
> project /Drools /has adopted MVEL as a vehicle for primary expression
> and statement evaluation; since 5.2.0 it seems that I don't have a
> choice for some parts of the Drools language. For me, this means that
> the full responsibility now rests with the Drools team - I cannot
> simply work around by sticking with 'dialect "java"'.
The
best way to get MVEL fixed is to submit unit tests. Such as the
examples here:
https://github.com/mvel/mvel/blob/master/src/test/java/org/mvel2/tests/co...
Mike isn't religious about jiras, but he will insist on a unit test.
Using a github fork to write the unit test and then submit a pull
request is trivial to do.
>
> Sorry if this sounds harsh and egocentric, but what I've heard about
> MVEL maintainer's non-eagerness for fixing bugs hasn't inspired me to
> do otherwise. (Since this is hearsay, I should add the politically
> correct statement: "innocent until proven otherwise".)
Mike just won't explore bugs, without unit tests. Once a unit test is
in place he's responsive in fixing it. Which is fair enough.
Mark
>
> Regards
> Wolfgang
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev