Would it break backwards compatibility when changed?
Op 21-02-13 15:49, Wolfgang Laun schreef:
After a period of more than 24 hours, this point is still open, and
the question of adding or not adding the dot leaves me in a tight
spot.
-W
On 20/02/2013, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Looking at
>
> WorkItemHandlerOption implements MultiValueKnowledgeSessionOption
>
> contains
>
> public static final String PROPERTY_NAME = "drools.workItemHandlers";
>
> which is used as
>
> public String getPropertyName() {
> return PROPERTY_NAME+name;
> }
>
> so that some actual property setting would have to be the ugly
> concatenation
>
> drools.workItemHandlerstheName = theHandler
>
> All (!) other multi-valued options use a period to separate the fixed
> part from the user-defined tag, i.e.,
>
> public static final String PROPERTY_NAME = "drools.workItemHandlers.";
>
> -W
>
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev