Hi Mark,
are there any news regarding the below mentioned issue of facts needing to
have a default constructor from drools 3.1.M on?
Thanks and best regards,
Maurice
Mark Proctor wrote:
Your facts must have a default constructor, due to our proxy generation
with shadow facts. We are working on multiple solutions for this.
Mark
Tom Gonzalez wrote:
>
> I am attempting to convert our application to use drools 3.1.M from
> current use of 3.0.4.
>
> I downloaded the binaries posted and am getting this very basic
> exception when building our rules.
>
> [java] Feb 19, 2007 5:21:25 PM
> com.nortel.connect.rbuilder.RulePackage addR
> ulesFromDrlFile
> [java] INFO: adding Rules from: CBMRules.drl (with
> associated DSL)
> [java] Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoSuchFieldError:
> recognizer
> [java] at
> org.drools.lang.DRLLexer$DFA18.<init>(DRLLexer.java:3914)
> [java] at org.drools.lang.DRLLexer.<init>(DRLLexer.java:3565)
> [java] at
> org.drools.compiler.DrlParser.getParser(DrlParser.java:78)
> [java] at
> org.drools.compiler.DrlParser.parse(DrlParser.java:110)
> [java] at org.drools.compiler.DrlParser.parse(DrlParser.java:96)
> [java] at
> com.nortel.connect.rbuilder.RulePackage.addRulesFromDrlFile(R
> ulePackage.java:219)
>
> Any suggestions for getting past this?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tom G
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/3.1-M1---Can%27t-get-rules-to-build-tf3255689.html#...
Sent from the drools - dev mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.