Re: [rules-dev] Possible memory leak in Drools 6.0.1
On 02/04/2014, kellyajp <kellyajp(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
31usd_lng_corp_bnd_cr_bbb_usd_over0y_under5y_2
// rule values at A650, header at A644
Certainly not connected to the memory leak, but I'd like to note that
this rule and all others will only work correctly if there is never
more than one Position fact in Working Memory at the same time.
-W