Re: [rules-dev] soundslike: report on phonetic matching
What you describe isn't an issue of providing a built-in operator that maps both
operands according to "any kind of processing" before doing == or !=.
Nevertheless, if anyone thinks that DoubleMetaphone is worth doing, it
could be added to the framework class I've outlined in my original mail.
-W
On 15 October 2010 18:11, jschmied <nabble(a)juergenschmied.de> wrote:
Hi!
I would put the creation of the key into a getter of my dataobject like:
class MyObject {
public String getMatchingKey() {
return doubleMetahone(myValue);
}
}
then insert this object into the working memory. You can write then your
rules like:
$a : MyObject ()
$b: MyObject(MatchingKey == $a.MatchingKey)
Drools calls the getMatchingKey only once and caches the result!
You can hide any kind of processing in a getter. As example I've done many
Date/Time processing like this.
juergen
--
View this message in context:
http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/soundslike-report-on-...
Sent from the Drools - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev