It should be possible to keep drools-verifier in the drools repo. Doing some changes to
support this right now.
Toni
On Feb 6, 2011, at 11:17 AM, Geoffrey De Smet wrote:
After the split-up drools-verifier is suppose to go into the drools
repo
and ide-common is suppose to go into the guvnor repo.
So drools-verifier can not depend on ide-common.
Is that an option, Toni?
With kind regards,
Geoffrey De Smet
Op 04-02-11 23:20, Esteban Aliverti schreef:
> @Geoffrey I started working on this issue. Here is the associated jira
> issue
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR-1186
> <
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR-1186>The problem is that
> drools-factconstraints depended on drools-verifier and drools-verifier
> depends on drools-ide-common. So, if I move drools-factconstraints into
> drools-ide-common, I will get a cyclic dependency error (because
> drools-ide-commons will depend on drools-verifier and drools-verifier
> depends on drools-ide-common).
> One solution (and maybe the easiest one) could be to move
> drools-factconstraints into drools-verifier. What do you think about
> this Toni?
>
> Best Regards,
>
> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
>
> Esteban Aliverti
> - Developer @
http://www.plugtree.com <
http://www.plugtree.com>
> - Blog @
http://ilesteban.wordpress.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev