Hi,
I vote for that. More release more often => Less function per release =>
less risk
Regards
Nicolas
2011/6/24 Geoffrey De Smet <ge0ffrey.spam(a)gmail.com>
**
If we do more releases, the releases process will become easier and maybe
even a non-event.
At least, I believe that paradox :)
Here's what I propose:
- For the next 4 weeks, until 22-JUL, we focus on big, risky features.
- The 2 weeks after that, until 5-AUG, we focus on bugfixing and *avoid
risky changes*.
On 5-AUG, I release 5.3.0.Beta1 directly from master.
If needed, we can call it 5.3.0.Alpha1 instead.
This will allow our users to verify backwards compatibility and new
features sooner
and give us feed-back sooner.
What do you think? Good idea or too ambitious?
--
With kind regards,
Geoffrey De Smet
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev